2008-04-23_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1977247 (2)

Home Browse Search

• • ACZ Laboratories, Inc. • 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334 -5493 Matheson Mining Consultants ACZ ID WORI<NUM PARAMETER METHOD .- QUAL DESCRIPTION - L68214 - WG242095 Acidity as CaCO3 WG242120 Chloride WG241971 Fluoride WG241702 Nitrate /Nitrite as N, dissolved WG242312 Nitrite as N, dissolved WG241741 Total Alkalinity L68214 - WG242095 Acidity as CaCO3 WG242120 Chloride WG241971 Fluoride WG241702 Nitrate /Nitrite as N, dissolved WG242312 Nitrite as N, dissolved REPAD.15.06.05.01 WG242149 Sulfate WG242032 Nitrogen, ammonia WG242149 Sulfate WG241741 Total Alkalinity SM2310B - Titration 325.2 / SM4500CI -E SM4500F -C M353.2 - Automated Cadmium Reduction M353.2 - Automated Cadmium Reduction M353.2 - Automated Cadmium Reduction 375.4 - Turbidimetric SM2320B - Titration SM2310B - Titration 325.2 / SM4500C1 -E SM4500F -C M353.2 - Automated Cadmium Reduction M353.2 - Automated Cadmium Reduction M353.2 - Automated Cadmium Reduction M350.1 - Automated Phenate 375.4 - Turbidimetric SM23208 - Titration RA RA RA RA HC RA M3 B4 RA RA RA RA HC RA RA M3 B4 Inorganic Extended Qualifier Report ACZ Project ID: L68214 Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). Initial analysis within holding time. Reanalysis was past holding time, which was required due to a QC failure during the initial analysis. Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). The spike recovery value is unusable since the analyte concentration in the sample is disproportionate to the spike level. The recovery of the associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. Target analyte detected in blank at or above the acceptance criteria. Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). Initial analysis within holding time. Reanalysis was past holding time, which was required due to a QC failure during the initial analysis. Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). The spike recovery value is unusable since the analyte concentration in the sample is disproportionate to the spike level. The recovery of the associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. Target analyte detected in blank at or above the acceptance criteria. L68214: Page 39 of 51