Laserfiche WebLink
Affected Lands <br />Exhibit A <br />April 27, 2011 <br />Exhibit A <br />August 9, 2011 <br />Changes in Acreage <br />May Day 1 <br />3.5 <br />3.56 <br />+0.06 <br />May Day East <br />0.5 <br />0.97 <br />+0.47 <br />May Day 2 <br />3.3 <br />3.72 <br />+0.42 <br />May Day 3 (Lamb) <br />3.2 <br />3.14 <br />-0.06 <br />Idaho Mill Site <br />3.1 <br />3.2 <br />+0.1 <br />Payday Mill Site <br />5.1 <br />5.18 <br />+0.08 <br />Augmentation Pipeline <br />0.4 <br />Included w /Idaho <br />Included w /Idaho <br />Chief Portal <br />0.3 <br />0.98 <br />+0.68 <br />La Plata Bridge <br />0.1 <br />0.1 <br />0 <br />Base of Operations <br />1.0 <br />0.95 <br />-0.05 <br />Exploration Drilling <br />15.8 <br />0 <br />-15.8 <br />Pre - existing Roads <br />9.5 <br />17.7 <br />+8.2 <br />New Access Road <br />1.8 <br />4.73 <br />+2.93 <br />Affected Land Totals <br />47.6 <br />44.23 <br />-3.37 <br />Mr. Wallace H. Erickson <br />Response to Sixth Adequacy <br />October 11, 2011 <br />Page 3 <br />Table 1: Additions of Affected Lands from April 27 to August 9, 2011 <br />In the fifth adequacy letter the Division informed the Applicant, pursuant to Rule <br />1.1(6), the submittal constituted an amendment to CN -01. The Division requested the <br />Applicant complete the filing process for this second amendment to CN -01, as previously <br />required for the first amendment to CN -01, filed April 27, 2011. Alternately, if the <br />Applicant did not intend to expand the boundary of affected lands, the Division requested <br />the application be revised to reflect no increase in affected lands. <br />The Applicant's response, received on September 9, 2011, provided contradictory <br />information regarding affected land acreages. The contradictions were substantial and <br />sufficient to confuse what is intended. <br />According to the new Figure C -4, Total Operational Area, and Attachment 2, <br />Response to Fifth Adequacy, affected lands now included 33.08 acres. According to the <br />new Exhibit A, Legal Description, and Exhibit E, Reclamation Plan, affected lands now <br />included 44.23 acres. Exhibit A was accompanied by three survey maps, which <br />provided different acreage values from those declared in the text of Exhibit A and Figure <br />C -4. The affected land acreages of the September 9th submittal are illustrated on the <br />following table, Table 2. <br />DEN 97,629,117v1 10 -11 -11 <br />GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP ® ATTORNEYS AT LAW ® WWW.GTLAW.COM <br />