My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-10-11_REVISION - M1981185
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2011-10-11_REVISION - M1981185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:58:22 PM
Creation date
10/12/2011 9:21:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/11/2011
Doc Name
Response to 6th adequacy letter to CN-01
From
GreenbergTraurig for Wildcat Mining Corporation
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Wallace H. Erickson <br />Response to Sixth Adequacy <br />October 11, 2011 <br />Page 25 <br />in the Standard Operating Procedures summarized in Attachments G -2, G -3, G -4 and G- <br />5. <br />Adequacy Issue No. 16. <br />The Geotechnical Stability Exhibit, required under Rule 6.5, was reviewed by <br />staff member Tim Cazier. Mr. Cazier had previously generated a technical review <br />memorandum, dated August 19, 2011, which was attached to the Division's fifth <br />adequacy letter. Mr. Cazier has reviewed the Applicant's response to his previous <br />memorandum and has identified outstanding adequacy issues in a follow -up <br />memorandum, dated September 28, 2011. Copy of Mr. Cazier's review memorandum, <br />dated September 28, 2011, is attached. Please address the adequacy issues identified by <br />Mr. Cazier. <br />Response to Adequacy Issue No. 16. <br />See contemporaneously submitted Response to September 28 Cazier Memo. <br />Adequacy Issue No. 17. <br />The application provided the following work plans: <br />• Attachment D -1 of Attachment 1 of Exhibit D, <br />Construction Work Plan <br />• Attachment D -2 of Attachment 2 of Exhibit D, <br />Work Plan May Day No. 1 <br />• Attachment D -3 of Attachment 3 of Exhibit D, <br />May Day No. 2 Drainage Control <br />• Attachment D -4 of Attachment 4 of Exhibit D, <br />Portal Work Plan and Lamb Affected Area Litt <br />• Attachment D -5 of Attachment 5 of Exhibit D, <br />Work Plan <br />• Attachment D -6 of Attachment 6 of Exhibit D, <br />Construction Work Plan <br />• Attachment D -7 of Attachment 7 of Exhibit D, <br />Characterization Work Plan <br />• Attachment D -8 of Attachment 8 of Exhibit D, <br />and Kinetic Testing Work Plan <br />a. The work plan proposed in Attachment D -1 was reviewed by staff <br />member Peter Hays. Mr. Hays had previously generated a technical review <br />memorandum, dated August 22, 2011, which was attached to the Division's fifth <br />adequacy letter. Mr. Hays has reviewed the Applicant's response to his previous <br />DEN 97,629,117v1 10 -11 -11 <br />GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP m ATTORNEYS AT LAW ® WWW.GTLAW.COM <br />New Access Road <br />Portal Collapse Repair <br />Little Deadwood Gulch <br />Chief Drainage and <br />le Deadwood Gulch <br />Dry Stacked Tailings <br />Augmentation Pond <br />Tailings Geochemical <br />Whole Rock Sampling <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.