My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-08_REVISION - M1977342 (35)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977342
>
2011-09-08_REVISION - M1977342 (35)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:43:02 PM
Creation date
10/12/2011 7:59:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977342
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/8/2011
Doc Name
Additional Copies of 2010 Documents
From
Climax Molybdenum
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR14
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
There are four types of storm which need to be considered. The first is the local storm while the <br />other three are general storms. The conclusions presented in the Williams Fork study were <br />reviewed for each of the storm types as they affect the Henderson Mill watershed location. <br />The largest of the historic storms that have occurred over regions similar in climate and <br />topography to the Williams Fork drainage basin have been identified. The list includes the largest <br />63 of these storms. That list was further refined to the most significant storms of each type that <br />should be considered for Williams Fork. There are 15 storms on this list which is presented in <br />Table 1. <br />Thunderstorms <br />Thunderstorm events over the Rocky Mountains are relatively small events <br />compared to the mesoscale convective complexes that occur over the midwestern states. <br />However, during the period of mid -July through August there is potential for significant rainfall <br />totals from this type of storm although the areal extent of the rainfall is limited. These storms <br />occur as a result of coincident spatial and temporal occurrence of a number of necessary <br />meteorological factors. Those factors include: <br />a) adequate atmospheric moisture in the boundary layer or through a more significant <br />depth, <br />b) atmospheric instability, <br />c) an initiating or triggering mechanism such as surface heating or orographic lift, and <br />d) a focusing mechanism such as channeling by terrain or standing waves from an upwind <br />terrain feature. <br />The Williams Fork study found that the maximized and transpositioned Opal, Wyoming, <br />storm of 1990 was the most significant. That storm was critically centered over the Williams <br />Fork watershed. The most important issues with this storm relative to the Henderson Mill <br />drainage basin is storm centering. Because the boundary layer inflow wind is southwesterly, the <br />storm cannot be centered any closer to the Henderson Mill drainage basin than over the Williams <br />Fork River because of the rainshadow effect of the Williams Fork Range. Hence the local storm <br />center provided in the Williams Fork study should be used for the Henderson Mill basin. The <br />Local Storm Worksheet for the Opal storm maximized and transpositioned to the Williams Fork <br />watershed is presented in Table 2. <br />Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.