My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-08_REVISION - M1977342 (35)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977342
>
2011-09-08_REVISION - M1977342 (35)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:43:02 PM
Creation date
10/12/2011 7:59:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977342
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/8/2011
Doc Name
Additional Copies of 2010 Documents
From
Climax Molybdenum
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR14
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Discussion <br />The Hydrometeorology Reports (HMRs) which apply to the Williams Fork drainage basin and <br />adjacent regions to the east were reviewed and used as a baseline. HMR 49 and HMR 55A were <br />reviewed extensively with the storm data base and standardized procedures given particular <br />attention. When HMR. 49 was developed, guidance was drawn from HMRs for adjacent or <br />neighboring regions. To the east of the Continental Divide, HMR 51 provided the closest <br />reference. A comparison shows large PMP differences from west to east, with much greater PMP <br />values east of the Divide at comparable latitudes. The issue of how to treat the resultant PMP <br />gradient across the Continental Divide proved to be difficult to address. The result was that <br />relatively high PMP values were shown west of the Divide in HMR 49 over the immediate <br />western slope, including the location of the Williams Fork drainage. <br />It is important to note that in HMR 49, this circumstance is acknowledged and addressed directly. <br />Referring to HMR 49 Figure 1.1 (Figure 1 in this report), the following statement is presented in <br />the HMR 49 text: <br />"The shaded portion of Figure 1.1 is a zone to the west of the Continental Divide <br />where the PMP values are considered least certain. Detailed generalized PMP <br />estimates including seasonal variations are not available for the slopes immediately <br />east of the Continental Divide. PMP gradients in this region can influence PMP <br />estimates west of the Divide. A future PMP study covering the area east of the <br />Divide is needed before there will be comparable confidence in PMP over the <br />contiguous portion of the Southwestern States." <br />HMRs 55 and 55A have provided the needed studies east of the Continental Divide. However, <br />the issue of PMP gradients west of the Divide still needs to be addressed with detailed studies <br />such as the site - specific Williams Fork PMP study. <br />The location of the Henderson Mill drainage on the northeast slope of the Williams Fork Range is <br />very significant. This location is in the immediate rainshadow of the Williams Fork Range and <br />therefore storms which occur over the basin have the Williams Fork Range as an immediate <br />upwind moisture barrier. This barrier is the second significant moisture barrier under <br />southwesterly boundary layer wind conditions (the inflow wind direction for the largest of the <br />general storms) in the central Rockies. The Gore Range provides a slightly higher barrier further <br />to the southwest. A picture of the Gore Mountains is shown in Figure 3. This view to the <br />southwest from Ute Pass at the top of the Henderson Mill drainage basin shows how significant <br />this range is as a barrier to low level atmospheric moisture approaching the Williams Fork basin <br />from the southwest. <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.