My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-08_REVISION - M1977342 (35)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977342
>
2011-09-08_REVISION - M1977342 (35)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:43:02 PM
Creation date
10/12/2011 7:59:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977342
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/8/2011
Doc Name
Additional Copies of 2010 Documents
From
Climax Molybdenum
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR14
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
damage from the PMF; however, the inlets would most likely require cleaning. The exception <br />to this is the Ute Creek Reservoir bypass intake. Significant effort would be required to repair <br />this inlet if it assumed that Ute Creek Dam will fail during the flood, as the flood routing <br />analysis indicates. <br />The existing interceptor canal around the tailing basin does not include overflow <br />spillways at the several small tributary crossings. It is likely that during the PMF the canal <br />would wash out at the crossings and would require repair. It is anticipated that this repair <br />would be a high priority in the days following the PMF. This repair could be accomplished <br />using equipment and personnel at the mill and /or outside contractor equipment and labor. It <br />is expected that overtopping outside of the tributary crossings would be fairly well diffused <br />because of the very flat grade of the canal and access road (0.1 foot of fall in 100 feet). <br />Floodwater flow with the highest erosion potential would be focused on the crossings. Other <br />excess water would overtop with modest erosive energy. If the canal were damaged by the <br />flood, it is expected that this damage would occur at isolated areas that could be quickly <br />repaired. <br />For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that it would take approximately 7 <br />days after the flood to repair the East Branch and Horseshoe intakes so that this flow would <br />be diverted into the flood bypass pipeline and out of the system. With respect to the lower <br />flood bypass canal, we estimate that it would require approximately two weeks of earthwork <br />effort to repair the canal. These assumptions are necessary to determine the post -flood <br />adjustment described below. <br />Methods of Floodwater Removal <br />Due to the elimination of the gravity flow decant/spillway system, the plan for removal <br />of the floodwaters from the tailing pond must involve pumping. The pumping options that <br />would be available at the mill would include the proposed pump barge, the use of `on- site" <br />portable diesel pumps, and the use of imported diesel pumps. <br />• Pump Barge: It is unlikely that the proposed barge pumping system would be <br />significantly damaged during the PMF event. The discharge pipeline is buried with a <br />minimum of five feet of cover and power is supplied via an overhead power <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.