My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-08_REVISION - M1977342 (35)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977342
>
2011-09-08_REVISION - M1977342 (35)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:43:02 PM
Creation date
10/12/2011 7:59:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977342
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/8/2011
Doc Name
Additional Copies of 2010 Documents
From
Climax Molybdenum
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR14
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESULTS OF FLOOD MODELING DURING THE PMF <br />The total area of all basins contributing to the tailing pond is about 11.52 square <br />miles, which is 7,373 acres. The total volume of the 5.6 -inch storm over this area would be <br />about 3,441 acre-feet. According to the HEC-1 model, about 359 acre-feet would be lost to <br />infiltration and other abstractions. A copy of the HEC-1 output file is included in Appendix C. <br />The remaining 3,082 acre -feet would accrue to storage in the tailing pond. The volume of <br />baseflow, which is estimated to be 3.61 cfs per square mile, would be 82 acre -feet during the <br />24 -hour period after the onset of the storm. <br />The flood routing model indicates that Ute Creek Reservoir would be overtopped <br />during the PMF. It is thus a reasonable assumption that Ute Creek Reservoir would fail <br />during this storm and the 130 acre -feet normally stored would be emptied into the tailing <br />pond. However, it is our opinion that the flood wave and additional volume of water from <br />failure of Ute Creek Reservoir would not cause a domino effect and would not damage the <br />tailing pond embankment. East Branch Reservoir would not be overtopped and thus it is not <br />likely that it would fail during the PMF. With the additional volume from the Ute Creek <br />Reservoir failure and baseflow during the 24 -hour period after the onset of the storm, the total <br />inflow to the tailing pond during the PMF would be 3,294 acre - feet. <br />Based on the pond configuration at the time of the fall -2003 survey, we can conclude <br />that the PMF, in conjunction with failure of Ute Creek Reservoir, would not overtop the tailing <br />pond and that there would be about 2.9 feet of residual freeboard to the dam crest. The <br />water level in the pond would be expected to rise about 5.1 feet during the storm. <br />Due to the constantly changing configuration of the tailing impoundment, the critical <br />characteristic of the PMF is the total pond inflow volume. As long as the amount of surcharge <br />storage capacity in the pond exceeds this amount with an allowance for inflows to the pond <br />after the PMF, this analysis indicates that the tailing pond would be capable of containing the <br />runoff resulting from the PMF event. It is important to note that any excess capacity in East <br />Branch Reservoir below the level of the emergency spillway would reduce the flood volume <br />that would flow into the tailing pond up to a maximum of 676 acre -feet, which is the total flood <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.