My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-29_PERMIT FILE - M2009056
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2009056
>
2011-09-29_PERMIT FILE - M2009056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:43:29 PM
Creation date
10/6/2011 12:04:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009056
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
9/29/2011
Doc Name
Draft Environmental Assessment
From
BLM Royal Gorge Field Office
To
DRMS
Email Name
DB2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
What happens when naturally occurring, potentially harmful chemicals are exposed <br />through the processes of open pit mining? This is becoming an issue for aquatic life even <br />now from old mine /tailing sites. <br />f. WILDLIFE, TERRESTRIAL — 7 comments were received and are summarized below: <br />i. The mine site is directly in a migratory path for elk and deer and they bed down <br />in the trees directly across from the entrance to this site. <br />ii. If the mine site is fenced, how will that disrupt the wildlife constantly migrating <br />through this area to get to the water /pasture? <br />iii. The animals will be endangered by the heavy vehicular traffic. <br />g. MIGRATORY BIRDS — None <br />6. HERITAGE RESOURCES AND HUMAN ENVIRONMENT <br />57 <br />a. CULTURAL RESOURCES — 1 comment was received and is summarized below: <br />Archeological evidence of numerous small, old medicine bottle found on the proposed <br />mine BLM land. <br />b. TRIBAL AND NATIVE AMERICAN RELIGIOUS CONCERNS — None <br />c. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES — None <br />d. VISUAL RESOURCES — 6 comments were received and are summarized below: <br />i. Negative visual impacts will affect residents, property owners, visitors and town <br />businesses that will see the mine from Front Street. <br />ii. The sight pollution associated with this proposal will result in no more elk and <br />deer in the nearby housing areas. <br />e. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE — 1 comment was received and is summarized below: <br />Punishment for being poor and living in a poorer community because someone can <br />afford to buy BLM land and build a mining operation right next to the community <br />because of the power of money. <br />f. WASTES, HAZARDOUS OR SOLID — 3 comments were received and are <br />summarized below: <br />i. Given the proximity to the South Platte River any leaching of petroleum <br />products and /or chemicals would jeopardize water life as well as groundwater <br />and the aquifer. <br />ii. Descriptions of the quantity and disposal methods of waste rock and backfill <br />material are non - existent and /or inconsistent in the application. <br />7. LAND RESOURCES <br />a. RECREATION — 7 comments were received and are summarized below: <br />i. This piece of property is used for family recreation, which will be destroyed by <br />the mining operation. <br />ii. Having the mining operation on top of the South Platte riverbank would destroy <br />this wonderful recreation area that has taken 20 years to fix up. <br />iii. Sport fishermen will find Fairplay 's world class fishing waters at Fairplay <br />Beach and Recreation Area less attractive and enjoyable with an active <br />gold /gravel pit less than 300 yards away. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.