Laserfiche WebLink
11. A long -term recommended off -site mitigation is mine applicant cooperative financing to <br />pave the 1 -mile access route to the site to reduce total fugitive dust generation from <br />material and vehicle movement. <br />12. Compliance with CDHPE requirements if threshold of 5 tons /year for uncontrolled <br />PM10 is exceeded. This would involve preparation of a Mining Operations Fugitive <br />Particulate Matter /Control Plan. <br />Implementing the recommended mitigations would reduce any adverse residual effects on air <br />quality from Destiny Mine operation. The reviewer recommends that the operator conduct <br />regular visual fugitive dust monitoring at the site during hours of operation as part of the 3809 <br />mine inspection to verify PM10 migration is limited to the BLM administered lands and <br />homeowner protections. <br />No Action Alternative <br />Direct and Indirect Impacts: If the proposed Destiny Mine is not permitted there will be no <br />direct or indirect impact to current air quality in Park County, Colorado or near Class I areas. <br />Cumulative Impacts: None <br />Mitigation/Residual Effects: None <br />Alternative 1 <br />Direct and Indirect Impacts: Direct and indirect impacts to air quality that would result from a <br />Destiny mine operation, as described in Alternative 1, are considered similar to impacts and <br />CDPHE permitting requirements as described in the Proposed Action. Assessment is based on <br />similar mine operation hours, total exposed surfaces for dust generation, equipment use and <br />traffic. There is the potential for dust generation to be higher from materials stockpiles in <br />Alternative 1 in comparison with the Proposed Action based on the greater length of time that <br />the disturbed soil surface would be exposed to wind. However, the reduction is total vehicle <br />traffic from the operation, given sand and gravel would not be transported to markets, would <br />result in lower fugitive dust generated on Big Thompson Park road, and thus lower risk of <br />exposure in Alternative 1 vs. the Proposed Action. <br />Based on data available and the low relative emissions of CAAQS criteria pollutants, <br />specifically dust (PM10), NOx, and CO, the direct and indirect adverse impacts to air quality <br />and people from the Alternative 1 to permit the mine without sand and gravel sales are <br />considered long -term but moderate to immediate homeowners and people recreating in the <br />adjacent recreation area, long -term and minor to Park County, and long -term but negligible to <br />Colorado and Class I areas. <br />Cumulative Impacts: Cumulative impacts to air quality are considered the same as in the <br />proposed action. <br />Mitigation/Residual Effects: Same as Proposed Action <br />CLIMATE AND CLIMATE CHANGE <br />Affected Environment: <br />18 <br />