Laserfiche WebLink
Lastly, we note that although Denison provided the BLM's approvals as attachments to its <br />EPP application, Denison neglected to inform the DRMS that the BLM approvals are <br />subject to ongoing BLM State Director Review. In early 2009, the BLM Colorado. State <br />Director approved a request to review the ROD and FONSI submitted by Denison at <br />Attachments J and K. <br />In conclusion, we ask the Division to apply conservative assumptions in assessing <br />operational controls and reclamation activities. Successful reclamation is often difficult <br />and its associated costs vastly under estimated. Colorado citizens must never again be <br />forced into covering reclamation costs. By applying the strictest scrutiny to the <br />Denison's EPP, the Division can safeguard the public and the environment. We look <br />forward to additional opportunities to comment on Denison's proposal, including the <br />recalculated bond amount, and ask the Division make such plans fully open to comment <br />and technical review. <br />Sincerely, <br />— a ien Borg, Executive Director <br />INFORM (Information Network for Responsible Mining <br />P.O. Box 461235 <br />Glendale, CO 80246-1235 <br />damien@a,informcolorado.org <br />Hilary White, Director <br />Sheep Mountain Alliance <br />PO Box 389 <br />Telluride, CO 81435 <br />970 -729 -2321 <br />6 <br />