Laserfiche WebLink
Sixth Adequacy Letter, Amended CN -01 <br />May Day Idaho Mine Complex, M- 1981 -185 <br />16. The Geotechnical Stability Exhibit, required under Rule 6.5, was reviewed by staff <br />member Tim Cazier. Mr. Cazier had previously generated a technical review <br />memorandum, dated August 19, 2011, which was attached to the Division's fifth <br />adequacy letter. Mr. Cazier has reviewed the Applicant's response to his previous <br />memorandum and has identified outstanding adequacy issues in a follow -up <br />memorandum, dated September 28, 2011. Copy of Mr. Cazier's review memorandum, <br />dated September 28, 2011, is attached. Please address the adequacy issues identified <br />by Mr. Cazier. <br />17. The application provided the following work plans: <br />• Attachment D -1 of Attachment 1 of Exhibit D, New Access Road Construction <br />Work Plan <br />• Attachment D -2 of Attachment 2 of Exhibit D, Portal Collapse Repair Work Plan <br />May Day No. 1 <br />• Attachment D -3 of Attachment 3 of Exhibit D, Little Deadwood Gulch May Day <br />No. 2 Drainage Control <br />• Attachment D -4 of Attachment 4 of Exhibit D, Chief Drainage and Portal Work <br />Plan and Lamb Affected Area Little Deadwood Gulch <br />• Attachment D -5 of Attachment 5 of Exhibit D, Dry Stacked Tailings Work Plan <br />• Attachment D -6 of Attachment 6 of Exhibit D, Augmentation Pond Construction <br />Work Plan <br />• Attachment D -7 of Attachment 7 of Exhibit D, Tailings Geochemical <br />Characterization Work Plan <br />• Attachment D -8 of Attachment 8 of Exhibit D, Whole Rock Sampling and Kinetic <br />Testing Work Plan <br />a. The work plan proposed in Attachment D -1 was reviewed by staff member Peter <br />Hays. Mr. Hays had previously generated a technical review memorandum, dated <br />August 22, 2011, which was attached to the Division's fifth adequacy letter. Mr. <br />Hays has reviewed the Applicant's response to his previous memorandum and has <br />identified outstanding adequacy issues in a follow -up memorandum, dated <br />September 23, 2011. Copy of Mr. Hay's review memorandum, dated September 23, <br />2011, is attached. Please address the adequacy issues identified by Mr. Hays. <br />b. The work plans proposed in Attachments D -2, D -3, D -4 and D -6, have been reviewed <br />by staff member Tim Cazier. Mr. Cazier had previously generated a technical review <br />memorandum, dated August 22, 2011, which was attached to the Division's fifth <br />adequacy letter. Mr. Cazier has reviewed the Applicant's response to his previous <br />memorandum and has identified outstanding adequacy issues in a follow -up <br />memorandum, dated September 27, 2011. Copy of Mr. Cazier's review <br />memorandum, dated September 27, 2011, is attached. Please address the adequacy <br />issues identified by Mr. Cazier. <br />c. The work plans proposed in Attachments D -5, D -6, D -7, and D -8, have been reviewed <br />by staff member David Bird. Mr. Bird had previously generated a technical review <br />11 <br />