My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-10-03_REVISION - C1980007 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2011-10-03_REVISION - C1980007 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:43:43 PM
Creation date
10/3/2011 12:48:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/3/2011
Doc Name
Phase II Bond Release Application
From
Savage & Savage
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />2.0 METHODS <br />2.1 SAMPLING DESIGN <br />Prior to initiation of fieldwork, the permit document and applicable maps were reviewed to <br />evaluate topography, reclamation timing, seed mixes, revegetation methods, management, <br />and applicable revegetation standards. <br />A map of the mine site at 1:14,400 scale (1' was used to identify, locate and delineate <br />the reclaimed areas (MCC Reclamation Photograph Project 2010, Figure 1). As the <br />reclaimed areas are spread out over approximately 10,000 acres and the sites range from 0.1 <br />to 14.0 acres in size, standard methods of gridding the reclaimed areas and generating random <br />sample points was not practical. Further, as the reclaimed areas ranged in age from three (3) <br />to fifteen (15) years in age, it was desirable to obtain a representative sampling of the age <br />structure in the sampling. <br />From the map it was determined that the reclaimed areas were located in eleven (11) distinct <br />locales within the Dry Fork drainage parcel. The reclaimed sites, their areal extent, and age <br />were entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. The area of each reclaimed site was <br />calculated as a percentage of the total area of reclaimed sites, as was the total area of <br />reclaimed sites by reclamation year. By selecting an initial number of total samples (30), <br />locations for sampling by representative area and reclamation year were obtained. <br />Sample locations within each sample site were randomly determined by use of a 50'x50' grid <br />representing the reclaimed site. For example, where a reclaimed site was one acre in size, a <br />50'x50' grid yielded sixteen potential sample points. A sample point within the reclaimed <br />site was then selected using a random numbers table. In the case of linear reclaimed sites <br />(road segments), the total length and width of the reclaimed road segment was determined <br />and a random numbers table used to generate a location based on the origin and terminus <br />values (in 50' increments) of the road segment. A grid was employed to determine the <br />sample point location within the reclaimed road corridor, in the same way it was employed <br />for reclaimed drill sites. <br />Sample sites were located in the field through compass triangulation and pacing from known <br />landmarks. The MCC Reclamation Photograph Project 2010, Figure 1 (Appendix) illustrates <br />the location of the reclaimed areas. <br />The following table identifies the grouped reclaimed sites, their area, date of reclamation, <br />percentage of the total reclaimed area and number of initial samples. <br />Mountain Coal Company, LLC West Elk Mine <br />2011 Reclaimed Areas Vegetation Report <br />Phase II Bond Release <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.