Laserfiche WebLink
Binns, Janet <br />From: W D Corley, Jr. [ajjc @att.net] <br />Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 9:30 AM <br />To: Binns, Janet <br />Subject: Energy Fuels pond EC <br />Ms. Binns, <br />George Patterson said yesterday that he had talked with you about partially leaving their pond no. 5 in place to <br />catch storm water runoff and slowly release that water into the drainage. He said that you indicated that the <br />Division had allowed such a practice in the past and that it was entirely possible. <br />You also outlined at the recent inspection and in your report the conditions which would govern the retention of <br />the pond regarding The Corley Co. obligations, i.e. agreement with Energy, our assumption of maintenance <br />requirements, and State Health Dept. water quality regs. In the event that the Division and Energy agree to the <br />partial retention of the pond along the lines that George talked about with you, what would then be The Corley <br />Company obligations? Would we still have to comply with the conditions you outlined? <br />W.D. Corley, Jr. <br />1 <br />La r <br />PSIS <br />