My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-16_HYDROLOGY - M1981185
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2011-09-16_HYDROLOGY - M1981185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:43:11 PM
Creation date
9/26/2011 9:17:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
9/16/2011
Doc Name
Hydrology Report
From
CDPH E
To
Various
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In regard to whether the Idaho #1 Mine Portal is mine drainage: <br />Based on available information, the water coming out of the portal is not a natural spring or seep, but flows out of a historic <br />(collapsed) mine portal, and therefore the drainage is associated with a man -made disturbance (mine portal). In a 1993 EPA <br />letter (often referred to as the Dotson Letter or the Fraser Memo), the EPA clearly outlines its stance regarding hard rock <br />mines, point sources, historic drainage and NPDES permits. The following are exerpts from that letter: <br />1. Point Sources at Hard Rock Mines <br />a. Historic Adits <br />"Mine adits are clearly point sources as defined under Section 502(14) of the CWA....defines the term "point <br />source" as any discernable confined and discrete conveyance including but not limited to any pipe, ditch <br />channel, tunnel, conduit... from which pollutants are or may be discharged....Following this definition, <br />discharges from mine adits at historic or active mines are point sources and are required to have an NPDES <br />permit if pollutants are being discharged to waters of the United States." <br />b. Groundwater Hydrologically Connected to Surface Water <br />"..mines had seeps or other groundwater discharges to surface water which were not authorized in the facility's <br />NPDES permit. There were also some mines without an NPDES permit which had claimed to be "non- <br />discharging "....were found to be discharging through seeps and water control structures....are now being <br />required to obtain NPDES permits...It is therefore EPA's position that seeps and other groundwater discharges <br />hydrologically connected to surface water from mines, either active or inactive, are discharges from point <br />sources and are subject to regulation through an NPDES permit." <br />2. Historic Mining <br />"Clearly as discussed in 1.a above, discharges from abandoned mine adits are point sources which require a <br />traditional (rather than a stormwater) NPDES permit...EPA's current permit writing practices and priorities <br />incorporate historic mine drainage into NPDES permits for active mines if the active mine influences the <br />pollution discharged from the historic area. In addition, if the active mine owns or has control over an adjacent <br />historic mining area, the active mine must also apply for an NPDES permit to control the discharge from the <br />inactive area." <br />3. Stormwater vs. Traditional NPDES <br />"It is our position that any point source discharge of pollutants not directly associated with a precipitation or <br />snow melt event, (i.e. dry weather flows), must be permitted under a traditional NPDES permit. This means <br />any dry weather flow from mine adits, seeps, french drains and culverts are mine drainage or process water and <br />cannot be covered by a stormwater permit....Also during wet weather flows, most of the areas at an active mine <br />must be covered by traditional NPDES requirements because stormwater was included in the developing the <br />effluent guidelines regulations." <br />Because the water in question flows out of a mine portal, the discharge is associated with a mining activity. As clearly shown <br />in the above statements, this water must be covered under a process water (individual, non - stormwater) permit as it: <br />1) is a point source; <br />2) is included regardless of whether it is drainage from an adit or is a seep /spring; and <br />3) although it is a historic discharge it is included in an area where active mining is being planned and such mining <br />may influence the discharge or is in an adjacent area for which the permittee owns or has control over. <br />Additionally, the Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety (DRMS), at this time, is considering the water to be mine <br />drainage. Based on communication with DRMS, the water has been characterized as mine drainage in numerous documents <br />including: <br />1) DRMS 3 1T1 adequacy letter for AM -01 to Idaho Mill, M- 2006 -069, June 8, 2009, page 1, item 2; <br />2) DRMS 5 adequacy letter for AM -01 to Idaho Mill, M- 2006 -069, August 11, 2009, page 4, item 7; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.