My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-22_ENFORCEMENT - C1982056 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2011-09-22_ENFORCEMENT - C1982056 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:43:19 PM
Creation date
9/23/2011 7:42:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
ENFORCEMENT
Doc Date
9/22/2011
Doc Name
Email Regarding Additional Information
From
Jerry Nettleton
To
DRMS
Violation No.
CV2011005
Email Name
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
interpreted to mean a blended backfill consisting of soil fill and coal waste, meeting the 5% coal content <br />threshold. It should be noted that, based on statements by 3B Enterprise, the operator of the Deakins Pit, <br />this interpretation and approach had not previously been questioned by inspectors for the Minerals Group, <br />and only became a question or concern following the recent complaint. <br />Twentymile Coal, LLC Position and Issues <br />1) The activities which resulted in the NOV occurred without TC's knowledge or consent, and were <br />conducted by parties which were either not under TC's supervision or control (3B Enterprises), or <br />which were acting outside the scope of TC's direction and intent (Bower Brothers). <br />As previously noted, it was TC's intent and direction that road clean -up materials be transported <br />to and disposed of in the Twin Landfill, a State approved disposal facility. The diversion of waste <br />materials to any other location(s) occurred without notice to or approval of TC. TC's first <br />indication that waste materials had gone to any location other than the Twin Landfill, as directed, <br />were contacts from Jason Musick and Dan Hernandez resulting from the Minerals Group <br />inspection, as previously referenced. <br />2) There are inherent practical and operational problems with the regulatory definitions and <br />provisions as they relate to handling and disposal of "coal wastes" and "non -coal wastes ". <br />The following regulations govern handling and disposal of "coal mine waste ": <br />4.10 COAL MINE WASTE BANKS <br />4.10.1 General Requirements <br />(1) All coal mine waste shall be transported and placed in new and existing disposal areas <br />approved by the Division for this purpose. These areas shall be within a permit area. The <br />disposal area shall be designed, constructed, inspected and maintained: <br />(a) In accordance with 4.09.1, 4.09.2, 4.10, and 4.11; and <br />(b) To prevent combustion. <br />(2) Coal mine waste materials from activities located outside a permit area, such as those activities <br />at other mines or abandoned mine waste piles may be disposed of in the permit area only if <br />approved by the Division. Approval shall be based on a showing by the person who conducts <br />surface coal mining operations in the permit area, using hydrologic, geotechnical, physical, and <br />chemical analysis, that disposal of these materials does not: <br />(a) Adversely affect water quality, water flow, or vegetation; <br />(b) Create public health hazards; or <br />(c) Cause instability in the disposal areas. <br />TC has an existing approved coal mine waste disposal facility (Coal Refuse Disposal Area <br />(CRDA)), which currently receives coal processing waste from the Washplant at the Foidel Creek <br />Mine. The inherent practical and operational problem with the regulatory definitions and <br />provisions is that the CDRMS interprets Rule 4.10.1(1)(b) as meaning that no combustible <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.