My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-16_REVISION - M1990057 (9)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1990057
>
2011-09-16_REVISION - M1990057 (9)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:12:53 PM
Creation date
9/20/2011 7:42:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1990057
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/16/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
The Union Milling Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR3
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September 16, 2011 <br />Mr. Michael Cunningham <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Re: Permit M1990 -057, TR #3 Adequacy Review <br />Dear Mr. Cunningham, <br />The Union Milling Company <br />6200 S. Vivian St. <br />Littleton, CO 80127 <br />+1.303.947.3499 <br />Union Milling Company (UMC) is responding to the Adequacy Review of Technical Revision #3 (TR), <br />currently on extension until September 21, 2011. Question 19 of the Adequacy Review was submitted <br />separately on September 9, 2011. The responses to the other 18 questions are below. <br />CDRMS question <br />1. The Applicant has stated a lower access road will be constructed on the south side of the mill. A <br />2010 aerial image of the site shows that there is a road located south of the mill. Please clarify if <br />a new road will be constructed or if the existing road will be upgraded. In addition, describe <br />how the road will be constructed or how the existing road will be improved. The description <br />should include dimensions of the road as well as any associated drainage and runoff conveyance <br />structures. <br />UMC Response <br />The Division is correct. There is an existing road south of the mill. This existing road will be <br />reconstructed to a level road at elevation 9725ft, which is the crest of the Phase 1 TSF embankment, and <br />the foundation of the mill. The south side of the road will have a berm (Jersey barriers) to prevent <br />vehicles, delivery trucks from driving off the road or onto the TSF embankment. The road will be sloped <br />at 2 to 3% to the south and graded to ensure south road surface water runoff reports to the TSF. The berm <br />(Jersey barriers) will assist in controlling the runoff flow and directing runoff to the TSF. <br />The road will be widened to allow passage around the new thickener at the southeast corner of the mill <br />building. The road, during TSF construction, will be a minimum of 40ft wide with a 25ft turning radius <br />at the southwest corner of the building. The road will built in lifts in accordance with Lake County <br />driveway standards, using both the overburden stockpiled from the previous (existing) TSF construction <br />and the excess cut material generated from the TSF construction. The road is shown on TSF 02. <br />RECEIVED <br />SEP 162C', <br />Division of Recfrr <br />Mining & <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.