My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-16_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010089 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2011-09-16_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010089 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:43:10 PM
Creation date
9/19/2011 1:28:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089
IBM Index Class Name
APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE
Doc Date
9/16/2011
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review No. 2A
From
DRMS
To
Western Fuels Association, Inc
Email Name
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C- 2010 -089 PAR No. 2A <br />New Horizon North Mine <br />Sincerely, <br />16- Sep -2011 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />Rule 2.05.6(3)(b)(iv)requires that the operator have a hydrologic monitoring plan in place <br />to determine the impact on the hydrologic balance. Under Rule 2.05.6(3)(b)(iv)(D), the <br />Division can require the monitoring of additional water quality parameters in this <br />hydrologic monitoring plan if warranted by site - specific conditions and for good cause <br />shown. <br />The chemical analyses for overburden, interburden and underburden presented in <br />Appendix Table 2.04.6 -2 show that some of these metals are in the rocks, although <br />chromium, cyanide, nickel and silver were not sampled. The Division believes that, <br />because these heavy metals have receiving stream standards and because these heavy <br />metals are present in the rocks at the New Horizon North Mine, the surface water <br />monitoring program should include these chemical constituents. <br />Likewise, the Division's Guidelines for the Collection of Baseline Water Quality include <br />arsenic, cadmium, manganese, mercury, and zinc (dissolved species) and these were not <br />included in the Water Quality Parameter List for groundwater. Further these constituents <br />are included in the Basic Standards for Groundwater (Tables 1 and 3). The Division <br />believes that these constituents should also be included in the approved water monitoring <br />program for groundwater. <br />Also, at the time of bond release, Rule 3.03.2(2)requires the Division to make an <br />evaluation that surface or subsurface water pollution is not occurring. Therefore, all <br />relevant chemical parameters need to be included in the water monitoring program. <br />Please include these chemical constituents in Table 3 and in future surface water and <br />ground water sampling or justify the omission of these heavy metals in the surface water <br />and ground water parameter list . Also, please ensure that the species for each chemical <br />parameter is included in Table 3 and is the species that is monitored. The ground water <br />parameters include both total and dissolved species for some constituents. For surface <br />water parameters, each species should be consistent with the species listed for the San <br />Miguel River stream segment 12 in Regulation No. 35 of the CDPHE Water Quality <br />Control Commission's "Classifications and Numeric Standards ". The interne address is: <br />http: / /www.cdphe. state. co. us /op /wqcc /Standards /RegsCurrent /35 2011(06)tables.pdf <br />Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these additional issues. <br />Sandra L. Brown <br />Sr. Environmental Protection Specialist <br />cc: Marcia Talvitie <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.