My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-17_PERMIT FILE - C1981018A (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981018A
>
2011-06-17_PERMIT FILE - C1981018A (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:34:35 PM
Creation date
9/12/2011 12:39:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/17/2011
Section_Exhibit Name
Section IV. Mine Surface Facilities Operations Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
White River and the rocky pinyon juniper habitat along the western border of the lease. This <br />. restricted habitat occupation is not, however, due to habitat preference nor to ability to occupy other <br />habitats. It is likely due to extensive predator control in the livestock area and high pelt prices.' The <br />proposed actions will not alter nor create problems with their habitat but will create problems for the <br />bobcat. The perturbation value of 5 is based on increased accessibility, more people in the area <br />and hunting pressure associated with such. <br />Pronghorn populations are reduced over much of their range that includes grass and sagebrush <br />habitats of the western United States. On the proposed site of the coal mine and its associated <br />facilities, pronghorns are located only on the northern and eastern boundaries of the coal mine, the <br />waste disposal site. They occupy the grass habitat in greater numbers (0.1 -0.5 per hectare). <br />Although there is little of their habitat that will be seriously impacted and there is sufficient for the <br />population levels, concern must be given to the disposal area and the coal conveyor to guarantee <br />they do not interrupt habitat utilization. The coal conveyor was constructed to allow adequate <br />passage of pronghorn to facilitate near normal habitat utilization. The disposal site was originally <br />thought to potentially obstruct a natural antelope passage from range to the north of the site to a <br />permanent water source at Cactus Reservoir. Pronghorn frequent the active portions of the <br />disposal area using the wide -open black surface for a bedding area. The sediment ponds are also <br />heavily used as a water source by pronghorn and other wildlife species. <br />LITERATURE CITED <br />is Braun, C.E., T. Britt, and R.O. Wallstad. 1977. Guidelines for maintenance of sage grouse <br />habitats. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 5:99 -106. <br />Dalke, P.D., D.B. Pyrah, D.C. Stanton, J.E. Crawford, E.F. Schlatter, 1963. Ecology, productivity, <br />and management of sage grouse in Idaho. J. Wildl. Manage. 27:811 -841. <br />Johnsgard, P.A. 1973. Grouse and quails of North America. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln. <br />553 pp. <br />Patterson, R.L. 1952. The sage grouse in Wyoming. Sage Books, Inc. Denver. 341 pp. <br />Personal Communication. Clyde L. Pritchett and Clive D. Jorgensen. Dept. of Zoology Brigham <br />Young University, Provo, Utah. 25 Sept. 1980. <br />Scott, J.W. 1942. Mating behavior of the sage grouse. Auk. 59:477 -498. <br />IV.M.4 Perturbation Values for Prime Species The perturbation values listed (Table II.1-1-43, <br />II.1-1-44) for the self - identified prime species are a composite of the potential impacts that might be <br />• Technical Revision #68 (01/2011) IV -4 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.