Laserfiche WebLink
C- 2010 -089 PAR No. 2 <br />New Horizon North Mine <br />9- Sep -2011 <br />Page 9 of 25 <br />5. Response accepted. <br />6. Under Rule 2.04.7(2) and referring to Map 2.04.7 -1 and Table 2.04.7 -5 on page 17 of <br />Section 2.04.7, please explain why Nygren Draw does not have any operational surface <br />water monitoring sites, since it passes through the permit area. <br />DRMS: In the May 26, 2011 submittal, Western Fuels explained that the monitoring of <br />Nygren Draw will be resumed before disturbance. Map 2.04.7 -1 was revised to include sites <br />SW -N213 and SW -N214. The Division requests that baseline monitoring of sites SW -N213 <br />and SW -N214 continues for at least four consecutive quarters. <br />7. In Table 2.04.7 -5 on page 17 of Section 2.04.7, surface water monitoring stations SW -N201 <br />and SW -N208 are listed for the 2 Park sub lateral. However, this sub lateral does not <br />appear on Map 2.04.7 -1. Please explain. In addition, are all of the irrigation ditches and their <br />branches shown on the map? <br />DRMS: Western Fuels updated Map 2.04.7 -1 in the submittal dated May 26, 2011 to show <br />all of the sub laterals. However, are all of the irrigation ditches and their branches also <br />shown on Map 2.04.7 -1? Please refer to question no. 13 in this section <br />8. In the "Effects of Mining on the Permit Area Geomorphology" section on page 23 of <br />Section 2.04.7, mention is made of Chiles Draw. This draw does not appear on Map 2.04.7- <br />1. Is this draw supposed to be Glasier Draw? <br />DRMS: The Division has no further concerns. The reference should have been Glasier <br />Draw but the May 26, 2011 submittal removed this specific reference anyway and shifted <br />the PHC to Section 2.05.6(3). Response accepted. <br />9. On page 21 of the Probable Hydrologic Consequences discussion of Section 2.04.7, it is <br />stated that the 2nd Park Lateral irrigation ditch water will be put into a pipeline and diverted <br />around the mine site. After mining, the original ditch would be reestablished. Please point <br />out which maps show the proposed location of the pipeline. <br />DRMS: As stated in their May 26, 2011 submittal, Western Fuels will provide the <br />requested map when the ditch relocation report is completed. Response accepted. <br />10. Response accepted. <br />11. Response accepted. <br />12. Response accepted. <br />13. Response accepted. <br />14. Response accepted. <br />15. In several instances in the permit application, reference is made to baseline surface water <br />hydrology data being located in the New Horizon 1 Area and the New Horizon 2 Area <br />permit applications. Please include all baseline information relevant to the proposed New <br />Horizon North Mine in the New Horizon North Mine permit application. <br />DRMS: Additional water monitoring data from the New Horizon No. 1 Mine was added to <br />Appendix 2.04.7 -2 in the May 26, 2011 submittal. However, please explain why baseline <br />surface water monitoring data from the New Horizon No. 2 Mine that is referenced in the <br />New Horizon North permit application was not submitted as well. <br />