My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-02_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010089 (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2011-06-02_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010089 (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:34:06 PM
Creation date
9/8/2011 10:36:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
6/2/2011
Doc Name
Vegetation Survey
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.04.10
Email Name
MLT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />extreme north, south, east and west boundaries of each vegetation site sampled were converted to <br />the 1983 Colorado State Plane South Zone (NAD 83) coordinate system. The interval used in the <br />state plane coordinate system is based on foot increments. Given the typical real -time accuracy <br />of this GPS unit of plus or minus one meter, all of the vegetation boundaries and sample transect <br />locations were field located at a sub -meter accuracy. <br />Once the boundaries of the proposed vegetation disturbance areas or reference area were <br />identified, then using a specially prepared computer program which generates random <br />coordinates, the potential transect location coordinates were identified. These coordinates were <br />then entered into the GPS unit and the transect location starting points were identified in the field <br />using the navigate feature of the GPS. At each transect location starting point, the transect <br />direction was determined by selecting a random direction based on the degrees of the compass (0 <br />to 360 Once the transect orientation was determined, then the 50 -meter tape was laid out <br />across the site. All transects were kept within the sample unit boundaries. In situations where the <br />transect placement resulted in the transect alignment crossing a sample unit boundary, the <br />transect line was backed up for that portion of which crossed the boundary line 180 degrees. <br />Where the 50 -meter tape could not be placed within a narrow vegetation polygon due to <br />boundary constraints, then the transect alignment was changed 90 degrees at the point where the <br />boundary line was crossed to ensure that the entire transect alignment was located within the area <br />to be sampled. <br />Plant Cover. Plant cover was evaluated by randomly sampling ten previously identified <br />intervals along the outstretched 50 -meter transect tape. At each designated sample point, an <br />inclined metal ten -point frame, one meter in height was positioned perpendicular to the tape and <br />a sharpened metal rod was dropped. Each designated interval was sampled at approximately ten - <br />centimeter intervals along the ten -point frame. Even transect random numbers were sampled on <br />the right -hand side of the tape and odd numbers were sampled on the left -hand side of the tape. <br />In the wetland vegetation type, due to the long, often linear alignment of these polygons, where <br />the transect alignment would have resulted in multiple bends in the 50 meter transect tape, a <br />shorter 5 meter transect length was used. In these instances, the random sample intervals <br />generated for the 50 meter transect length were converted to decimeters. <br />Each observation was recorded as to the specific plant species encountered as the sharpened rod <br />was dropped. If no plant cover was encountered, then the observation was recorded as to the <br />presence of plant litter, rock, bare ground, lichens or cryptograms. Plant material produced in <br />the 2009 growing season which was still attached to the plant was considered as living plant <br />material and the dead plant material which had fallen to the ground was considered to be litter. <br />The 100 data points collected along each transect were then summarized into a single datum for <br />purposes of statistical analysis. Absolute and relative plant cover, species diversity, and plant life <br />forms were determined based upon the observations collected in sampling the plant cover. <br />Section 2.04.10 Page 3 April 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.