Laserfiche WebLink
Corey Heaps <br />CAM Colorado LLC <br />August 10, 2011 Page 17 <br />year and the soils so adverse. Yes, this species could be added to the seed mixture, but it <br />would be a total waste of time and money with no realistic expectation that any would ever <br />grow. For these reasons, we have to decline the Division's suggestion. <br />Division Response: In CAM's response to the Division's suggestion to add inland saltgrass <br />(Distichlis spicata) to the seedmix, it was explained that inland saltgrass was only present <br />on the wet, irrigated fringes of the reference area. Based on this fact that was not self <br />evident in the data provided, the Division agrees with CAM to not include it in the <br />seedmix. The Division does believe that a 2% perennial grass cover should be included in <br />the vegetation success criteria. It is noted that the only perennial grass to contribute to <br />cover data was inland saltgrass, however, ten native perennial grasses are present on the <br />site. <br />76. Item resolved. <br />Rule 2.05.4(2)(fl Disposal of Debris, Acid Forming and Toxic Forming Materials <br />77 -79. Items resolved. <br />Rule 2.05.4(2)(h) Other Permits <br />80. Item resolved. <br />Rule 2.05.5 Postmining Land Uses <br />81-83a. Items resolved. <br />Rule 2.05.6(l) Air Pollution Control Plan <br />84. Item resolved. <br />Rule 2.05.6(2) Fish and Wildlife Plan <br />85 — 88. Items resolved. <br />Rule 2.05.6(3) Protection of Hydrological Balance <br />89 -99. Items resolved. <br />Rule 2.06.6 Special Categories of Mining <br />99a. Item resolved. <br />