My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-08-10_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2011-08-10_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:36:44 PM
Creation date
9/8/2011 7:40:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
8/10/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Letter No. 3
From
DRMS
To
CAM Colorado, LLC
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Corey Heaps <br />CAM Colorado LLC <br />August 10, 2011 Pag 15 <br />Division Response: The language used to describe the woody plant density standard is <br />confusing and it is not clear if a reference area or technical standard will be used for <br />comparison to show success. The Division suggests that CAM use only the approved <br />greasewood reference area as a standard which achieves 90% woody plant density of <br />the approved greasewood reference area sample mean at the 90% confidence level. <br />CAM - Examination of the Greasewood Predisturbance Area shrub density data found in Table <br />2.04.10 -5, documents that the average shrub density of this area is 17.84 plants per 100 <br />square meters or 721.98 plants per acre. Since a total of 13 of the 25 density transects <br />sampled had shrub density values of less than 500 plants per acre or 12.35 plants per 100 <br />square meters, CAM - Colorado LLC is proposing a shrub density success standard of 500 <br />stems per acre at the time of final bond release. Permit page 2.05 -38 will thus be modified <br />accordingly. <br />Division Response: A reference area has been established and sampled. The Division <br />questions the wisdom of switching the shrub density success standard from a reference area <br />to a technical standard of 500 shrubs /acre. The advantage of a living reference area is to <br />allow for changes through time that a technical standard does not account for. Please <br />explain in further detail why CAM is requesting to have a technical standard for <br />shrub density success over the reference area. <br />74a. A reference area is being used to determined the revegetation success on the reclaimed <br />area. It has not been demonstrated by the operator as per Rule 4.15.7(3), that the reference <br />area is statistically comparable to the disturbed area in terms of vegetative cover, <br />herbaceous production and shrub density. Please submit a statistical demonstration that <br />the reference area is equivalent to the proposed disturbed area. <br />75. For the diversity success standard, the Division believes it would be appropriate to also <br />include a half -shrub and a perennial grass component. <br />CAM Response: Please see revised seed mixes SM -1 and SM -2 in Exhibit 4. <br />Division Response: In the baseline vegetation survey, inland saltgrass (Distichlis spicata) <br />was the only species of grass that contributed to plant cover. The Division suggests adding <br />inland saltgrass (Distichlis spicata) to the reclamation seed mix. For the diversity success <br />standard, the Division believes that it is appropriate to include a native perennial grass. <br />Please add to the diversity standard on page 2.05 -38 that one perennial grass will <br />contribute at least 2% relative cover. <br />CAM - Examination of the plant cover data collected from the Greasewood Predisturbance Area <br />in 2010 and from the Elam Borrow Area in 2011, documents that of the 35 vegetation <br />transects sampled for plant cover in these areas only four of the transects had any cover <br />represented by this plant. The overall average cover of this plant across all of these areas <br />was 0.17 percent. Furthermore, a careful examination of the naturally revegetated areas <br />associated with the old refinery disturbances in the NE portion of the site and in the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.