My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-07_REVISION - C1994082 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1994082
>
2011-09-07_REVISION - C1994082 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:42:59 PM
Creation date
9/7/2011 12:58:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/7/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Responses
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL3
Email Name
SLB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
table value for alpha error probability of .20, with (n -1) degrees of freedom then H would be <br />rejected, and revegetation would be deemed successful. <br />Were the mean allowable herbaceous cover of an adequate sample from the 2010 Phase II BRB <br />less than 90% of the cover standard (see above), then a one - sample t -test would be made in the <br />following form to test the hypothesis of reclamation success for cover (CDMG 2005 revised rule, <br />4.15.11 (2)(b)): <br />t - Q <br />S <br />The (traditional) null hypothesis being tested would be that the bond release block mean (p) was <br />greater than or equal to 90% of the standard, stated as H µ >_ Q. If t was less than or equal to <br />the 1- tailed t table value for alpha error probability of 0.10, at (n -1) degrees of freedom, then H <br />was not rejected, and revegetation was deemed successful. <br />Climatic Data <br />Where: x = Bond Release Block Sample Mean <br />Q = 90% of Standard <br />S- = Standard error of mean (s /ji) <br />S = Sample standard deviation <br />n = Sample size <br />t = Calculated t value <br />t = Table t value (alpha = 0.1) see Rohlf and Sokal (1969) <br />Precipitation data were collected at the nearby Seneca IIW Mine during the period 1990 through <br />2010. Since the data record for Seneca IIW exists for only a relatively short period, the long term <br />average monthly precipitation data from the Western Regional Climate Center (WRCC) for the <br />nearby town of Hayden (57 years) was used as an appropriate base for comparison. Information <br />on degree -days was based on temperature data from met station 2 at the Seneca IIW Mine. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.