My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-29_PERMIT FILE - C1981019 (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2011-06-29_PERMIT FILE - C1981019 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:34:59 PM
Creation date
8/31/2011 9:52:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/29/2011
Doc Name
Tables
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 13 Bonding Information
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Changes to the Reclamation Bond Cost Estimate Due to TR -81 <br />The analysis is presented to evaluate the changes in the reclamation bond amount of $68, <br />224,123 originally proposed in February 2010 due to the impact of the approval of TR- <br />81. The only change attributable to TR -81 is that resulting from changes in the <br />dimensions of the temporary spoil pile that were adopted during the course of the TR -81 <br />approval process. Although the total volume of spoil does not change, the revised <br />geometry does result in a slightly higher pile than that used to develop the original bond <br />estimate in February 2010. The higher peak elevation of the spoil pile in turn causes a <br />decrease in truck hauling costs, limited to the uppermost lifts of the spoil pile. Because <br />this change produces a small adjustment in the overall bond amount, it is best handled as <br />a simple and tightly focused revision to the previous detailed estimate. <br />There exist two "worst case" 2012 bond surfaces presented on attached Figure 1. The <br />scenario depicted on the left panel of Figure 1 represents the conditions assumed for the <br />original proposed bond amount of $68,224,123, as submitted in February 2010. While <br />that bond calculation was based on an earlier version of Map 45, since changed during <br />the approval process of TR -81, the estimate was nonetheless based on the assumption that <br />the TR -81 package would be approved. As such, the bond calculation already included <br />the extended toe locations of the two valley fills (East and West Taylor Fills). However, <br />it did not anticipate changes to the East Pit temporary spoil pile that were adopted during <br />the TR -81 approval process. This submittal addresses those changes and their impact on <br />the total bond amount. <br />The right panel of Figure 1 depicts the condition of the temporary spoil pile as it has <br />evolved through the permitting progress of TR -81 from its initial submittal in September <br />2009 to its revised geometry in February 2011. The most significant change in the <br />temporary spoil pile is an increase in its height and a widening of the area above <br />elevation 8000 ft, as indicated in the red hashed area of the right panel of Figure 1. There <br />are no significant changes in the 2010 topography in the West Taylor Fill area. It should <br />be noted that throughout these revisions, the total volume of the temporary spoil pile has <br />not changed, but the location and elevation of the approximately 10.1 MCY shown in the <br />red hatched area has changed. <br />The haul distances and corresponding earthmoving costs associated with this 10.1 MCY <br />therefore need to be adjusted to match the now approved TR -81 pit and spoil pile <br />configuration for the "worst case 2012" condition. It should be noted that the adjustment <br />applies only to this volume, and only to the minor changes in haul distances. <br />It can be observed by comparing the left and right panels of Figure 1 that the center of <br />mass of the temporary spoil pile has actually moved about 728 feet closer to the South <br />Taylor pit, while the height of the spoil pile has increased about 25 feet, adding back <br />about 500 additional feet of ramp length. The net effect of this is a shortening of the <br />average haul length above El. 8,000 by about 228 feet and a consequent marginal <br />reduction in cycle time. This is the basis for the change in direct cost in the bond <br />calculation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.