Laserfiche WebLink
significantly larger than either the design runoff (0.682 ac -ft) or the as -built <br />runoff (0.505 ac -ft). <br />7. Map 2.05.3(3) -19 Pond 015 As- Built- Contours and Cross Section <br />a) Please identify the limit of sediment storage elevation on the Cross Section <br />b) Please generate an additional cross section running through the low point on the <br />outer berm. <br />c) The table in the upper right -hand corner appears to duplicate the Stage- Storage <br />Report on page 6 of Attachment 2.05.3(3) -24. Please delete the table from this <br />map, to avoid any future confusion. <br />Response: Please see the updated Map 2.05.3(3) -19, which now includes the <br />changes requested in these items. <br />8. Map 2.05.3(3) -20 Pond 015 As- Built - Ditches and Culverts <br />The watershed area acreages on this map are shown in very small font. Please <br />increase the font to an appropriate size. <br />Response: Font size was increased and new map is attached. <br />This concludes WFC's response to the DRMS review of TR -60. Please contact me with <br />any questions regarding this response. <br />cc: Ross Gubka, Western Fuels- Colorado <br />Sinc - rely <br />Ben Langenfeld, Project Engineer <br />Greg Lewicki and Associates <br />X: \Western Fuels Nucla \TR- 60 \TR -60 adequacy question #1 \TR -60 PRELIMNARY ADEQUACY RESPONSE <br />25AUG11.doc <br />6 <br />