My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-08-29_REVISION - M1986015 (11)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1986015
>
2011-08-29_REVISION - M1986015 (11)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:44:20 PM
Creation date
8/30/2011 7:22:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986015
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/29/2011
Doc Name
Amendment Submittal
From
Continental Materials Corporation
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Projected Phase 7 ground water level impacts were estimated based upon observed <br />ground water impacts during Phase 1 mining and a best -fit using the Dupuis equation. <br />Starting in January 2002, TMOP implemented a ground water level monitoring program <br />using a network of monitoring wells surrounding the Phase 1 mining area. Well water <br />levels were measured on a monthly basis throughout Phase I mining which was largely <br />completed in June 2007. Following Phase I mining, additional dewatering was completed <br />in the Phase II mining area. The location of the monitoring wells, Phase 1 and Phase 11 <br />mining areas are shown in Figure G -1. Water level hydrographs for the monitoring wells <br />are shown in Figure G -2. Total water level decline between January 2002, when Phase 1 <br />mining began, and July 2007, when Phase I mining was completed, was plotted against <br />distance from the Phase I permit boundary to evaluate the relationship between ground <br />water level decline and distance from dewatering. As expected, the relationship is nearly <br />linear and closely fits the Dupuit ground water flow equation, as shown in Figure G -3. <br />The Dupuit ground water flow equation for an unconfined aquifer was used to estimate <br />water level impacts from Phase 7 mining using an average saturated thickness of 25 feet <br />and a distance to zero drawdown of 3, 400 feet. Actual water level impacts may be less <br />than projected due to natural recharge, the buffering effects of the Arkansas River and <br />the distance to zero drawdown is probably less than 3, 400 feet. Ground water level <br />impacts are not projected south of the Arkansas River, which provides aquifer recharge <br />and buffers water level drawdowns. As a result, projected ground water level impacts <br />near the Arkansas River are probably overstated due to recharge from the River. <br />(c) Inventory of Local Water Supply Wells <br />To complete the well inventory, the State's database of well permits was queried to identify <br />wells that may be located within affected areas. TMOP conducted field visits to all identifiable <br />wells and water users that may be affected by Phase 7 dewatering. Well owners were interviewed <br />regarding water use practices and the location of wells were recorded using a hand -held GPS. <br />Wells identified in TMOP's well inventory are presented in Figure G -1. Not all of the permitted <br />wells in the State's database were identified in the field, which is common due to lacking detail <br />and errors in the State's database, such as mis- located wells or wells that have been abandoned <br />and no longer exist. TMOP will coordinate with affected well owners to mitigate changes in well <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.