Laserfiche WebLink
F')e <br />This matter is being brought before the Board for consideratio • .. • • iolation for <br />failure to comply with the conditions of a Board Order for Fi S 34- <br />32.5 -124). Specifically, the board order required the Sikes to e • a 110c reclamation <br />permit by March 31, 2006. (see board order). <br />The 1 l Oc application was submitted on February 28, 2006, however, it was not called <br />complete until March 8, 2006 with a final decision date of April 7, 2006. Adequacy <br />comments sent out on April 4, 2006 and the applicant requested an extension until April <br />14, 2006, which is the date that the application was approved. The permit was issued on <br />May 3, 2006. <br />The board order states that the civil penalty shall be 41,566.40 with all but 566.40 <br />suspended if the prescribed corrective actions were completed by March 31, 2006. <br />Obviously this did not occur, however, the applicant was diligent in pursuing this permit <br />application and furthermore, they applied for a received approval for another 110c <br />application in the same general vicinity. It would have been better if the applicant would <br />have requested an extension of the original board order, however, it will be staff's <br />recommendation that the original board order be amended to extend the compliance date <br />or a new board order be issued with a new compliance date. Also, the applicant did post <br />an interim bond of $6000.00 and pay their civil penalty in a timely manner. <br />gcc-c <br />� m <br />Dec <br />