Laserfiche WebLink
C: <br />EXHIBIT 7, ITEM 20, PART G <br />TERRACE DITCH DESIGN <br />A series of terrace ditches will be constructed across the face of the permanent fills. The <br />locations of these are shown on Map 41A. These ditches will be approximately located along the <br />100 foot postmining contours. The function of the ditches is to direct overland flow runoff from <br />the face towards the channels of the ditches denoted as the East and West Tributaries of the East <br />Taylor Fill Ditch and the West Taylor Fill Ditch. The design basis for these permanent channels <br />is provided in Exhibit 7, Item 20, Part E. <br />The longest segment of the proposed Terrace Ditches is a westward draining branch of the ditch <br />originating at the 8200 foot elevation and emptying into the West Tributary of the West Taylor <br />Fill Ditch in the NEA of Section 19. This segment is approximately 2,520 feet in length. <br />Using this length and a tributary area of 51 acres as a design basis for all of the terrace ditches, <br />the dimensions of the representative ditch for the terrace ditches was developed using SEDCAD <br />as described below. For a conservative design, the applicable storm was set as a 100 year, 24 <br />hour event. <br />Sensitivity cases were examined using SEDCAD for several smaller sub -areas (3 to 22.6 acres) <br />with shorter times of concentration, but all produced smaller peak runoff flows than the modeled <br />51 acre sub -area. The 51 acre sub -area that was modeled could therefore be used for all <br />segments. The other terrace ditches will have more capacity than needed to convey their <br />respective 100 -year flows. <br />SEDCAD4 was used to determine the peak flow from this drainage area as detailed on the <br />following SEDCAD output pages. The 100 year, 24 hour design event was modeled using a CN <br />of 77 as adopted in TR -73 for reclaimed land with 1 to 2 years' growth. This would be <br />representative of a short term condition where the upstream area has recently been topsoiled and <br />seeded and has had only a year or two of growth. The long term condition would have a CN of <br />74 per the same TR -73, and would produce somewhat less runoff. The modeled case produced <br />a peak flow of about 24 cfs under the 100 year event. <br />As shown in the following SEDCAD output, a grass lined asymmetric triangular ditch cross <br />section is assumed, with a channel slope of 0.015 ft/ft and 1.5H:1 V side slope on the uphill side <br />and 3.OH:1 V side slope on the downhill side. It would flow at a depth of 2.4 feet deep when full <br />retardance associated with mature grass lining for the long term is in place. In the short term, <br />with a shorter immature vegetative cover, it would flow slightly shallower and at higher velocity, <br />though still acceptable at 3.7 fps. A nominal freeboard of 1 foot has been added to the calculated <br />flow depth for the long term, resulting in a generic ditch section at least 3.4 feet deep on a 1.5% <br />slope for all terrace ditches on the fill face. This depth has been rounded up to an even 4 feet, <br />with other design parameters as summarized below: <br />Exh. 7 -20G -1 Revision Date: 12/31/10 <br />Revision No.: TR -81 <br />