Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />3.1. Rangelands. <br />The post- mining land uses of rangeland and wildlife habitat have unquestionably been achieved. As <br />documented in Section 2.0 of this report, an erosionally stable and biologically diverse cover of plant <br />species and life forms (grasses, forbs and woody plants) sustainably supports an impressive <br />assortment and quantity of wildlife on the Trapper rangelands proposed herein for final bond release. <br />Recent aerial big game surveys conducted by John Monarch of Monarch & Associates demonstrate <br />that while mule deer numbers have remained stable since mining began in the mid- 1970's, elk <br />numbers have increased by an order of magnitude and pronghorn numbers have increased form zero <br />to hundreds. Reclaimed lands proposed herein for final bond release are subjected to grazing by big <br />game animals, in at least the hundreds during the summer months to thousands during the late fall <br />through early spring months. This degree of intense grazing has proven to be sustainable with no <br />significant detrimental effect on reclaimed rangelands. <br />In addition, recent Division of Wildlife studies and in house monitoring demonstrate that Columbian <br />sharp - tailed grouse are utilizing reclaimed rangelands for nesting and brood rearing to a much higher <br />degree than adjacent native and CRP lands. DOW research also indicates that reclaimed rangelands <br />at Trapper provide better quality habitat for sharptails than adjacent native or CRP lands. <br />Other wildlife species utilizing Trapper's reclaimed rangelands include greater sage- grouse, raptors, a <br />variety of small birds and mammals, and waterfowl. <br />4.0 Potential Hydrologic Impact <br />Monthly field inspections by DRMS and Trapper personnel since reclamation activities began <br />demonstrate that the reclamation proposed for bond release is hydrologically and erosionally stable. <br />The recontoured landscape, that includes properly designed reconstructed drainages, is well <br />vegetated and the hydrologic system is functioning as designed. <br />Potential off -site surface and groundwater impacts from mining in the area proposed for bond release <br />with this application are discussed below. A more detailed discussion of potential mine -wide impacts <br />is found in Section 4.8.3 (Probable Hydrologic Consequences) of the Trapper permit document (C -81- <br />010). Historical hydrology monitoring data can be found in Appendix W (annual report documents) of <br />permit document C -81 -010. <br />