My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_INSPECTION - C1994082 (82)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1994082
>
_INSPECTION - C1994082 (82)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2020 6:41:27 AM
Creation date
8/25/2011 9:09:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Coal Company
Inspection Date
7/18/2011
Email Name
SLB
SB1
BFB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 18, 2011 C-1994-082/Yoast:Mine SLB <br /> Inspection Topic Summary <br /> NOTE: Y=Inspected N=Not Inspected R=Coimments Noted V=Violation Issued NA=Not Applicable <br /> NA -Air Resource Protection R -Roads <br /> R -Availability of Records R -Reclamation Success, <br /> R -Backfill&Grading R -Revegetation <br /> NA -Excess Spoil and Dev. Waste NA - Subsidence <br /> NA -Explosives R - Slides and Other Damage <br /> R -Fish&Wildlife NA - Support Facilities On-site <br /> R -Hydrologic Balance Y - Signs and Markers <br /> Y -Gen. Compliance With Mine Plan NA Support Facilities Not On-site <br /> NA -Other NA -Special Categories Of Mining <br /> NA -Processing Waste R -Topsoil <br /> COMMENTS <br /> This was a complete inspection of the Yoast Mine conducted by Susan Burgmaier of DRMS. The <br /> purpose of the inspection was to evaluate the reclaration areas proposed for Phase II Bond Release in <br /> Seneca Coal Company's SL-3 bond release application. Sandy Brown and Brock Bowles of DRMS <br /> participated in the inspection, as did Christy Hulsman of OSM. Mark L. Stewart of Xcel Energy was <br /> present during the inspection of the North Pit area lands owned by Xcel; and Larry Kunkle <br /> (accompanied by Leon Meats)represented John Patrick at the pre-inspection discussion of the South area <br /> lands owned by John Patrick. Filimon and Mabel Salazar, adjacent landowners in the South area,were <br /> present during the pre-inspection discussion on the morning of July 191h. Jay James represented Seneca <br /> Coal Company(SCC)and was present throughout the inspection. <br /> Portions of the permit area that are not included in the Phase;II bond release request were inspected the <br /> afternoons of July 18 and 22, 2011. The North Pit area reclamation was inspected for the purpose of <br /> Phase 11 release on July 19,2011,and the South area Phase II request area was inspected on July 20, <br /> 2011. The mine site was also photographed aerially on July 18,2011. The photos were reviewed to <br /> supplement the ground inspection; selected photos are included in this report. <br /> Compliance records and permit documents were inspected at the Sage Creek Coal Company mining <br /> office on July 18, 2011. All required documents were available and current. Hydrologic records were <br /> inspected on the afternoon of July 21,2-011, and also found to be available as required. <br /> Ponds 010,011,012, 013, and 014 were inspected on July 18,2011. Pond 014 was discharging a trickle <br /> of clear water. The embankment was stable and densely vegetated. Pond 013 was not discharging and <br /> was stable and well vegetated. Pond 012 was discharging clear water; the underdrain was flowing into <br /> the pond. Pond 011 was discharging clear water. Pond 010 was also discharging clear water and was <br /> stable and well vegetated. <br /> The Pond 013 area slide has not yet stabilized; the southern edge of the scarp had moved since the last <br /> inspection. The toe area of the slide was saturated and the water was flowing into Pond 013. The small <br /> seep and slide north of the major slide had also moved considerably since the last inspection and was <br /> Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 0 <br /> Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: I <br /> Page 2of19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.