My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-30_REVISION - M1981302 (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981302
>
2011-06-30_REVISION - M1981302 (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2022 4:42:09 PM
Creation date
8/25/2011 7:56:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981302
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/30/2011
Doc Name
As-Built Drawings of Perimeter Levee- Apps. B-1 to B-11, Part 1.
From
The Regeants of the Univ. of Colorado
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR8
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Flood Control Levee August 24, 1999 Page 1 <br />the levee is constructed of, and that of the. naturally occurring sand and gravel under it are not <br />conducive to piping. CTL /Thompson, Inc. concludes: <br />"In our- opinion, the seeps are notpresently affecting the sir-uctity-al in eg ty ofthe levee and <br />the in egfity of the levee will not be affected by the I 00-yew-flood event. --' "o <br />Based on the CTL Thompson investigations, It is the opin*on of the author of this report that the <br />seeps do not pose a problem for the levee, but it is recommended that they be monitored annually, <br />and after any major flood which may reach the levee, as part of the University's Operation and <br />Maintenance na Manual (Appendix 11). <br />EROSION slo TECTIOl <br />Over the years, large rock was installed by the gravel mining company gn the southern end (most <br />upstream part of the upstream reach) of the levee from about S CA station 1 3 5+00+1- to 148+5 0. The <br />. <br />nprap: <br />is poorly graded (missing the smaller rock sizes), <br />D <br />s not toed into the ground, and <br />it does not rest on a filter layer. <br />In other locations along the upstream reach, the erosion protection which existed in September 1997 <br />consisted of: <br />• a mixture of rock and grass; <br />* reasonable stand of grass; <br />0 a poor stand of grass; and <br />a no grass cover at all. <br />Expected base -flood velocities in the upstream reach were determined by L CVVE by interpreting <br />the output of the recreated USAGE G& C-2 computer model. They are summarized in the <br />table below, and have a range from 4 to 9.4 feet per second (fps). <br />"o Page 9, CTL /Thompson, Inc.'s August 6, 1999 report "Levee at Ice p a Farm Pit <br />Boulder, Colorado "' (Appendix 9. <br />Cl_ck) LEONARD RICE CONSULTING WATER ENGINEERS, INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.