2011-08-19_REPORT - C1981035

• Permit No: C1981035
• IBM Index Class Name: REPORT
• Doc Date: 8/19/2011
• Doc Name: 2nd Quarter 2011 Review Checklist for Subsidence Monitoring Report
• From: DRMS
• To: File
• Permit Index Doc Type: Subsidence Report
• Email Name: TAK
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Monitoring requirement
Regulation citation
In compliance:
Yes / no ?
Comment
Installed and surveyed
monuments prior to
undermining.
2.05.6(6)(c)(i)(A)
Yes
Only the Crawford residence
required monuments. Those
monuments were surveyed
quarterly from Oct. 2001 until
April 2003 when DMG approved
suspension of monitoring. The
monuments are to remain in place
for possible future use (permit
Section 2.05.6, page 4).
Located monuments to
detect vertical
subsidence and
horizontal displacement.
2.05.6(6)(c)(i)(B)
Yes
Monitored each
structure's orientation,
location, elevation.
2.05.6(6)(c)(i)(C)
Yes
Quarterly monitoring is required
for only: surface cracks over
abandoned workings, the
Huntington ditch, and the
Crawford ditch.
Monitored each
monument and structure
at least quarterly.
2.05.6(6)(c)(i)(D)
Yes
Section 2.05.6 of the permit
application requires post -
undermining inspection of a fence
and two -track road at King II
Mine. Undermining has not yet
occurred.
Commenced monitoring
of each monument and
structure at least one
month prior to
undermining.
2.05.6(6)(c)(i)(D)
Yes
Submitted monitoring
report at least
semiannually.
2.05.6(6)(c)(i)(E)
Yes
Conducted sufficient
post- mining monitoring
to verify subsidence
prediction
2.05.6(6(c)(i))(F)
Yes
Accurately predicted
Yes
In compliance based on
subsidence.
2.05.6(6)(d)(i)
observations below.
There was no imminent
or actual material
damage or diminution of
Yes
In compliance based on
use of renewable
resource lands or
structures
2.05.6(6)(d)(i)
observations below.
Mine: King I and II Mines
Permit No.: C -81 -035
Report period: 2nd quarter 2011
Review Checklist for Subsidence Monitoring Report
Date this review was completed: 8/19/11
CDRMS reviewer: Tom Kaldenbach