My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-08-18_HYDROLOGY - M1977306
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1977306
>
2011-08-18_HYDROLOGY - M1977306
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:37:01 PM
Creation date
8/18/2011 3:01:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977306
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
8/18/2011
Doc Name
Colorado Discharge Permit System
From
Water Quality Control Division
To
Cotter Corporation
Email Name
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, Water Quality Control Division <br />Rationale — Page 19, Permit No. C00036251 <br />abandoned mine adits potentially discharging, there are no other permitted point sources discharging to the East <br />Paradox Creek and the Bull Canyon." There may be numerous point sources within the same stream segments <br />(all tributaries segment), however, the Division has no information showing any permitted facility discharging <br />into East Paradox and Bull Canyon. The WQCC Hearing Rationale for Stream Segment COGULDO3a to which <br />the East Paradox and Bull Canyon belong, provides the following information regarding point sources in Stream <br />Segment COGULDO3a "Point Sources: Umetco Minerals discharges to Lumsden Creek and its tributaries (CO- <br />0043575) and to John Brown Creek and its tributaries (CO- 0043591) ". <br />Estimates state that there are over 10,000 abandoned mines in Colorado (with some estimates up to 30,000), <br />many of which do not have owners that could be easily identified. Simply put, the Division does not have the <br />ability to track down all abandoned, unpermitted, point source discharges from mines. When these unpermitted <br />point sources and their owners are identified and they submit permit application, they will be permitted; <br />however, as stated in the December 22, 1993, memo from EPA regarding abandoned hard rock mines, these <br />remain a low priority for permitting. <br />Note that because the tributaries are considered to be zero low flow streams (no dilution available for setting <br />permit limits), the unpermitted sources and the proposed uranium mill will have no impact on the decisions <br />made on this permit. There is no assimilative capacity to share, and all facilities will receive the water quality <br />standards as permit limits (WQBELs). Note that the permit also contains an evaluation of the federal effluent <br />limitation guidelines (ELGs), which were added as additional level of protection, and imposed where numeric <br />standards for a particular parameter did not exist in the segment (total radium 226, dissolved radium 226). <br />Regarding possible unidentified point sources within JD -7 and JD -9 mines, it is the responsibility of Cotter, the <br />mine owner to identify these sources. These unidentified point sources should not preclude the Division from <br />issuing a permit for the proper disposal of wastewater from known sources. If additional sources are identified, <br />Cotter will need to provide treatment independently (applying for additional outfalls under the permit) or route <br />these sources to the current WWTF. Part II.A.8 of the draft permit specifically prohibits the permittee from <br />discharging from unpermitted point sources, stating "Any discharge to the waters of the State from a point <br />source other than specifically authorized by this permit is prohibited." <br />COMMENT 6: Land lease, use of public land, bonding issues, Mine Land Reclamation Act, DRMS <br />enforcement actions and groundwater issues. <br />The WQCD's crucial role in protecting Colorado's waters is particularly important where the DOE leased these <br />two mining tracts to the federal lessee Cotter Corporation in 2007 without first ensuring that these mines were <br />not violating the Clean Water Act. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) also retains concurrent jurisdiction <br />over the surface use of the public lands on which these mines are located. As these two mines are part of the <br />DOE's Uranium Lease Program, WQCD should ensure that DOE and BLM the main federal land managers for <br />uranium mining in the area, bring their respective regulatory authorities to bear to remedy the noncompliance <br />with the Clean Water Act requirements at the DOE - leased mines and the numerous other federal land mines in <br />these stream segments. <br />In addition to the federal jurisdiction and responsibility for these mines, any water treatment facilities must <br />receive review, approval, and bonding by the Colorado Division of Reclamation and Mine Safety ( "DRMS ") as <br />part of an Environmental Protection Plan ( "EPP ") which HB08- 1161 clarified is required for all uranium mines <br />in Colorado. Although DRMS and DOE may elect to use their existing bonds at these mines to fund work where <br />the operator is unable or unwilling to meet environmental standards, the WQCD has no bond in place. In this <br />case, it appears that the discharges needing point source permits may well necessitate a perpetual water <br />treatment operation. Further, the DRMS mine files identify no current intent to resume mining operations at <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.