Laserfiche WebLink
This (8,523 lb /acre) is equivalent to 4.26 tons /acre. OSM assumes this is the basis for the <br />conclusion on page 2.05.4(2)(e) -45 of the permit previously referenced which states, "The yield <br />ranged from a high of 4.26 tons /acre for highly managed alfalfa..." This is repeated again on <br />page 2.04.10 -61 of the permit which states, "the Alfalfa field which was intensively managed <br />produced the highest yields (8523 lbs /acre)," and this data is also shown in Table 2.04.10 -18 — <br />"Permit studies conducted in 1999." OSM again notes this is a first cutting only yield. <br />Examination of Exhibit 2.04.10 -1 of the permit indicates that field 1 referenced above consists <br />of predominately 98E - Darvey -Barx Complex Prime Farmland soils with a small amount of • <br />98D - Bowbac- Bowdish Complex soils $' <br />OSM also notes that the permit does state 1999 was an above average precipitation year. Such <br />climatic factors notwithstanding, both the soils and highly managed irrigated alfalfa yields <br />indicate, at a minimum, that a first cutting yield of 1.84 tons /ac may be an underestimate of <br />yield for irrigated alfalfa on this particular prime farmland. <br />It appears the data (in bold for easier reference) presented above is based on prime or prime - <br />like soils having a very similar yield for irrigated alfalfa according to the NRCS. It also <br />appears the actual first cutting yields for irrigated alfalfa grown on "Field 1" of the Morgan <br />property referenced in section 2.04.10, subsection 6.3 best matches the requirements of <br />Colorado Rule 2.06.6(2)(g) which reads in part, "Each plan shall contain, at a minimum: the <br />productivity under high level of management..." which is addressed in permit section <br />2.05.4(2)(e) which states Irrigated Cropland, "areas will have 100% alfalfa (not including a <br />companion crop) which are well - managed, irrigated consistently and harvested." <br />In sum, the estimated yield based on soils as well as the actual first cut irrigated alfalfa yield <br />from "Field 1" noted above compare reasonably well with the NRCS 4 April 2011 yield <br />estimates, and would seem to be the best information presented in the permit on which to base <br />a yield standard for irrigated alfalfa on prime farmland, and particularly for the Morgan <br />property as this is where this data appears to come from. However, OSM's review was unable <br />to determine that this information was used in constructing the 1.84 tons /ac first cutting yield <br />standard in the permit. <br />Section 2.04.10, subsection 6.3 continues, "The second Morgan hayland field of 28 acres is a mixture <br />of grasses and forbs with approximately 10 to 15 percent alfalfa. The field was not irrigated this <br />year and white tail prairie dogs have invaded about 1/8 of the field. Further cattle grazed the field <br />from late winter into the growing season. Morgan was going to renovate the field but did not have <br />the time this year. Morgan mowed and baled the field to reduce annual weeds and allow for future <br />operations. The field yielded 394 bales on first cutting with an average bale weight of 81 lb/bale. <br />The production for this field was 31,914 pounds (394 bales X 81 lb/bale) or 1,140 lb /acre. The third <br />field on the Morgan property was a small sub irrigated 1 acre parcel of grass and forbs. The field <br />yielded 21 bales on first cutting with an average bale weight of 87 lb/bale. The production for this <br />field was 1,827 pounds (21 bales X 87 lb/bale) or 1,827 lb /acre. " <br />Following this, page 2.04.10- 61(still in section 2.04.10 -6.3 of the permit) states, "Morgan plans a <br />second cutting of alfalfa. Neither Johnson or Morgan plan a second cutting of their grass hay and <br />13 <br />