2011-08-09_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088

• Permit No: C2010088
• IBM Index Class Name: APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE
• Doc Date: 8/9/2011
• Doc Name: Preliminary Adequacy Review
• From: Brock Bowles
• To: Mike Boulay
• Email Name: BFB
• Email Name: MPB
• Email Name: SB1
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Page 4 of 5
75. In CAM's response to the Division's suggestion to add inland saltgrass (Distichlis spicata) to
the seedmix, it was explained that inland saltgrass was only present on the wet, irrigated fringes
of the reference area. Based on this fact that was not self evident in the data provided, the
Division agrees with CAM to not included it in the seedmix. The Division does believe that a
2% perennial grass cover should be included in the vegetation success criteria. It is noted
that the only perennial grass to contribute to cover data was inland saltgrass, however, ten
native perennial grasses are present on the site.
76. Item Resolved.
77. Item Resolved.
Rule 2.05.6(2) Fish and Wildlife Plan
85. Item Resolved.
86. Item Resolved.
87. Item Resolved.
88. Item Resolved.
Rule 2.06.8(3) Alluvial Valley Floor Determination
100. Item Resolved.
101. Item Resolved.
102. Item Resolved.
103. Item Resolved.
104. Item Resolved.
105. Item Resolved.
106. Item Resolved.
107. Item Resolved.
108. Item Resolved.
109. Item Resolved.
110. Item Resolved.
111. Item Resolved.