My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-04-18_ENFORCEMENT - M1977300
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1977300
>
2011-04-18_ENFORCEMENT - M1977300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:32:40 PM
Creation date
8/10/2011 2:35:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
ENFORCEMENT
Doc Date
4/18/2011
Doc Name
Joint Answer Brief
From
MLRB and DRMS
To
District Court
Email Name
DB2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
also the location from which raw -water deliveries to the City of Arvada and <br />North Table Mountain Water and Sanitation District are made. R:00357. <br />Mr. Good further <br />tates that since October of 2008, uranium <br />concentrations in Ralston Creek entering Ralston Reservoir have risen steadily <br />to over 500 ug /L. R:00357. Monitoring by Denver Water indicated and the raw <br />water received at the Moffat Treatment Plant "clearly show increased <br />radionuclide concentrations over the course of Cotter's reclamation activities." <br />R:00357. <br />Mr. Good indicated that the Moffat Treatment Plant was not designed to <br />remove uranium, molybdenum, or other metals — any removal is incidental. <br />R:00358. Accordingly, Mr. Good stated that it is uncertain how an increase in <br />uranium would affect treatment capabilities at the plant. R:00358. Mr. Good <br />stated that Denver Water may need to modify its treatment plant and that the <br />financial impact to Denver Water customers "could be enormous, and a violation <br />of the drinking water act <br />standard for uranium could adversely affect the state's <br />economy. It is reasonable that these costs should be borne by Cotter." R:00358. <br />Mr. Good further stated in the letter that in addition to plant modifications, <br />Denver Water would also have to mitigate increased levels of uranium in the <br />plant's sludge, which contains sediment removed from the water. R:00358. Mr. <br />Good stated that the sludge currently meets requirements for beneficial reuse; as <br />radioactive - constituent levels increase, Denver Water may be forced to find a <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.