Laserfiche WebLink
Daniel Arnold, Esq. January 25, 2011 <br />Denver Water Page 8 of 21 <br />concentrations, resulting in an overall larger volume of contaminated water when the <br />sumps are pumping. <br />Additional evidence for this hydraulic connection with the creek was observed in October <br />and November 2010 when trenches for new sumps were excavated. According to Cotter <br />representatives during the mine site tour on November 5, 2010, the excavation work was <br />targeted for the fall when water levels and flow in the creek are typically low. Trenches <br />were initially dry only to fill with water overnight as the flow in the creek increased from <br />releases of water upstream of the mine. <br />Data Adequacy: Data used to evaluate the hydraulic connection between the alluvial <br />aquifer and the creek should include detailed stream flow measurements along the central <br />mine area. The magnitude of stream flow gain or loss would estimate the magnitude of <br />hydraulic connection. No detailed stream flow measurements are contained in the EPP. <br />Alluvial groundwater levels from the monitoring wells would also assist in evaluating <br />whether the alluvial aquifer is discharging to the creek or if the creek is losing water to <br />the aquifer. Water levels are standard measurements collected when wells are sampled, <br />but the EPP does not contain water levels for monitoring wells. <br />EPP Finding: Alluvial groundwater had elevated concentrations before the pumps in <br />the mine were shut off and the mine was allowed to fill. <br />The available data do not support this finding. Figure 4 presents a graph of historic <br />uranium concentrations from the EPP for wells MW -6 and MW -7; the two wells are in <br />the central mine area. As illustrated on the graph, concentrations for both wells were <br />lower in the late 1990s than recent concentrations. Concentrations increased in 2002 and <br />2003 and also again in past two years, and values are much higher than before the pumps <br />in the mine were shut down in May 2000. The sumps in the alluvial aquifer were shut off <br />in 2002, which the EPP claims is the reason for some of the increases in uranium <br />concentrations. However, Sump 1 continued to pump and recirculate untreated water <br />back to Sump 4 until 2009; thus, pumping from the sumps at some level has always <br />occurred until Sump 1 was shut down in 2009. <br />Data Adequacy: Historic groundwater quality data in the EPP prior to the cessation of <br />pumping in the mine in May 2000 are limited to 1998 and 1999. Several wells were <br />installed nearly a decade earlier in 1989 including MW -3A, MW -6, and MW -7. It is not <br />clear why the historic groundwater quality data prior to 1998 for these wells is not <br />contained in the EPP and would be valuable to determine if groundwater concentrations <br />were elevated before the mine was allowed to flood. <br />EPP Finding: The shutdown of pumping at Sump 1 in 2009 is responsible for the <br />increased uranium concentrations in the alluvial groundwater observed in the last <br />year. <br />