My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-01-25_REVISION - M1977300
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977300
>
2011-01-25_REVISION - M1977300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 3:11:55 PM
Creation date
8/9/2011 1:34:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
1/25/2011
Doc Name
Review of EPP
From
ARCADIS
To
Denver Water
Type & Sequence
AM2
Email Name
DB2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Daniel Arnold, Esq. January 25, 2011 <br />Denver Water Page 20 of 21 <br />values averaging 0.003 mg /L, to MW -0, which is downgradient of the rock piles and has <br />values averaging 0.167 mg/L. Uranium values in downgradient well MW -0 have always <br />been above the MCL and there is evidence of an increasing trend in recent years. The <br />waste rock piles require additional mitigation, otherwise groundwater with elevated <br />uranium concentrations will continue to enter the central mine area. <br />Uranium Mobility in Alluvium <br />DRMS states that the contaminants in alluvium are geologically unstable and easily <br />mobilized by minor fluctuations in groundwater levels, pH, or redox conditions. This <br />may be true, but the data to assess this are not contained in the EPP; groundwater levels <br />in monitoring wells and redox potentials are not provided. We found that the major factor <br />for uranium mobility in the alluvial aquifer is the degree of pumping from the sumps. <br />Reactive surfaces of the alluvium and fill may contribute uranium, but the pumping of the <br />sumps and degree of "dilution water" pulled into the aquifer from the creek is the <br />dominant factor. This is evidenced in 2009 when uranium concentrations in the <br />groundwater increased in response to stoppage of pumping in Sump 1. Concentrations <br />increased because dilution water from the creek stopped. <br />5.0 REFERENCES <br />Whetstone Associates. Inc. 2010. Schwartzwalder Mine Environmental Protection Plan. <br />Prepared for Cotter Corporation (N.S.L.). July 31. <br />Cotter Corporation (N.S.L.). 2010a. Letter to the Division of Reclamation, Mining and <br />Safety regarding Schwartzwalder Mine, Permit No. M- 1977 -300 and the September 2, <br />2010 notification of a discharging pipe. September 3. <br />Cotter Corporation (N.S.L.). 2010b. Personal communications with Cotter representatives <br />during site tour; November 5. <br />Cotter Corporation (N.S.L.). 2010c. Personal communications with Cotter representatives <br />relative to the November 22, 2010 Technical Memorandum summarizing the November <br />5, 2010 site tour. <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety. 2009. Letter to Cotter regarding the <br />Schwartzwalder Mine Permit No. M -1977 -300, Environmental Protection Plan, <br />Technical Revision TR -11, Adequacy Review #1, October 21. <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety. 2010. Letter to Cotter regarding the <br />Schwartzwalder Mine Permit No. M -1977 -300, Environmental Protection Plan, <br />Technical Revision TR -11, Adequacy Review #1, May 19. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.