My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-01-25_REVISION - M1977300
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977300
>
2011-01-25_REVISION - M1977300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 3:11:55 PM
Creation date
8/9/2011 1:34:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
1/25/2011
Doc Name
Review of EPP
From
ARCADIS
To
Denver Water
Type & Sequence
AM2
Email Name
DB2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Daniel Arnold, Esq. January 25, 2011 <br />Denver Water Page 13 of 21 <br />fault zone intersects the creek near the SW -PL sampling location at an elevation of <br />approximately 6,564 feet and the mine pool is currently at an elevation of 6,587 feet, <br />which is 23 feet higher than the fault -creek intersection. As a result, mine pool water can <br />flow into the alluvium and creek along the fault zone under natural gradient conditions. A <br />continued rise in the mine pool elevation may increase the hydraulic head (driving force) <br />along the fault resulting in an increased potential for the fault to convey mine pool water. <br />The relationship of the borehole and the Illinois Fault with the creek are illustrated on <br />Figure 6, which also shows the July 13 -14, 2010 uranium concentrations in the creek <br />along the mine. The borehole and Illinois Fault zone are in contact with the alluvium <br />between the SW -PL and SW -OS locations. As mine pool water discharges to the alluvial <br />aquifer it flows down valley as depicted on Figure 1 until discharging into the creek as <br />the aquifer begins to pinch near MW -6 and the SW -BOS creek location. This results in <br />the notable increase in uranium concentrations at SW -BOS. <br />The historic relationship of uranium concentrations in the alluvial aquifer (MW -6) and in <br />the creek (SW -BPL) and the mine pool elevation is shown on Figure 3 to illustrate that <br />concentrations are increasing in the creek. The uranium concentrations in the creek are <br />increasingly becoming more and more similar to concentrations in the alluvial <br />groundwater during base flow conditions, and this started when pumping of the mine <br />pool ceased in May 2000. An additional possible cause for the similarity is that untreated <br />water from Sump 1 was recirculated back to Sump 4, which is likely to have facilitated <br />groundwater flow to the creek from the 2002 through 2009 period. Also, there is an <br />apparent increasing trend in uranium concentrations in both the alluvial aquifer and in the <br />creek since about 2007 when the mine pool reached the elevation of the creek in the <br />central mine area. <br />The Schwartz Trend intersects Ralston Creek approximately 1,900 feet downstream of <br />the mine and may provide a conduit for mine pool water to enter the creek. The specific <br />conductance survey of the creek that was performed in November 2008 was designed to <br />investigate this possibility and there was an abrupt increase in specific conductivity at the <br />contact with the Schwartz Trend. Sampling of the creek across the trend was additionally <br />performed in December 2009 and sample results showed uranium concentrations to <br />decrease across the trend while radium 226 concentrations slightly increased. The EPP <br />states that based on the decrease in uranium concentration the trend is not a pathway for <br />mine pool water to reach the creek. Inspection of the historical data from sampling <br />locations upstream of the trend (SW -FBRG) and downstream of the trend (SW -ARH), <br />this appears to be the case. <br />EPP Finding: The maximum seepage from the mine pool is 1.2 gpm. <br />This finding is based on a pumping test in the #2 Shaft a few l Os of feet below the Steve <br />adit level. This seepage rate appears to be low considering that the vertically fractured <br />Illinois Fault zone passes through the mine, and possible discharging open boreholes <br />angled back into the mine from valley floor. Whether the 1.2 gpm rate is accurate or not, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.