My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-08-08_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2011-08-08_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:36:35 PM
Creation date
8/9/2011 8:56:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE
Doc Date
8/8/2011
Doc Name
3rd Surface Water Adequacy Review
From
Joe Dudash
To
Mike Boulay
Email Name
JJD
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 3 of 5 <br />3) It appears that Figure 13 should be re- labeled as Map 13. <br />4) In the submittal dated April 12, 2011, the plan view drawings on Map 13 for ponds 1 <br />and 2 were small and difficult to read. However, in the July 11, 2011 submittal, the <br />plan view drawings on Figure 13 (Map 13 ?) are too small to read. Please submit new <br />plan view drawings of each sediment pond, at a scale that is large enough to easily <br />read the contour lines, contour intervals and elevations. <br />5) There appears to be an inconsistency as to what sediment control structures will be <br />constructed alongside the railroad spur line. The Map 21 plan view appears to show <br />berms in place but the cross - section B -B ' shows that ditches will be next to the <br />railroad track. However, on Map 16 and Figure 13 (Map 13 ?), there appear to be <br />ditches on both sides for only part of the spur line. Please explain or revise the maps <br />so that there is consistency among these maps. <br />6) Please add more detail to the discussion of pond reclamation in Section <br />2.05.3(4)(a)(ii)(D) and, as was done for the topic of road reclamation, please add a <br />reference in Section 2.05.4(2)(c) on page 2.05 -30 that a general discussion of the <br />reclamation of the sediment ponds is presented in Section 2.05.3(4)(a)(ii)(D). <br />7) There are two short purple line segments shown along the railroad loop on Figure 13 <br />(Map 13 ?), Map 16 and Map 21, one between track locations 53 +00 and 64 +00 and <br />one between track locations 106 +00 and 110 +00. Please explain and add their <br />designations to the map legends or remove these lines. <br />8) Please update Section 2.05.6(b)(i) on permit text page 2.05 -54 to reflect that there <br />are three ponds and one SAE in the current sediment control plan. <br />9) Please change 20% slope to 0.2% slope for ditch 1 -d in the Ditch and Culvert Design <br />Summary on page Exh. 9 -2. <br />10) Please change "V -Ditch " to "Trapezoidal" and 0.5% slope to 8.0% slope for ditch <br />segment 3 -c in the Ditch and Culvert Design Summary on page Exh. 9 -2. <br />11) Please consider adding the bottom width for each trapezoidal ditch in the Ditch and <br />Culvert Design Summary on page Exh. 9 -2. <br />12) It appears that old Map 13 and Map 14 need to be deleted and the reference to Maps <br />13 and 14 on revised page 2.05 -18 and the Table of Contents for Volume II revised <br />accordingly, if appropriate. <br />13) Please label ditches 1-f and 1 -g on Figure 13 (Map 13 ?). <br />14) Please add the label for ditch 3 -c on Map 16. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.