My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-07-26_INSPECTION - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2011-07-26_INSPECTION - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:36:01 PM
Creation date
8/2/2011 1:37:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
7/26/2011
Doc Name
Photos and Notes from 7/22/11 site (Memo)
From
Rob Zuber
To
Susan Burgmaier
Inspection Date
7/22/2011
Email Name
SLB
RDZ
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866 -3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832 -8106 <br />INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM <br />Date: July 26, 2011 <br />To: Susan Burgmaier <br />From: Rob Zuber <br />Re: Photos and notes from 7/22/11 site visit to Seneca II -W <br />Drainage structures at the Seneca II -W mine have been failing due to extreme precipitation, including spring <br />snowmelt after heavy snowfall and summer thunderstorms. These structures include rip rap lining channels, <br />turf reinforcement materials (TRM) lining channels, and surge ponds. To view these problems, Rob Zuber, an <br />EPS with DRMS, inspected the site along with Susan Burgmaier, also of DRMS, and Jay (last name unknown), a <br />representative of Peabody Coal Company. <br />During the site inspection and afterwards, some potential solutions were discussed: <br />• Design for a larger event. This could entail one of the following or a combination. <br />o More ponds such as the "string of pearls" at Edna <br />o Larger ponds (Larger ponds could also reduce the short circuiting situation that exists now). <br />• Check dams. <br />• Drop structures. <br />• Discuss problem with the Nilex representative who sold Peabody the TRM. Perhaps he has ideas on <br />better installation methods (such as a way to get better surface contact between the ground and the <br />TRM) or other products (e.g., plastic check dams). <br />Most of these solutions would entail significant construction effort, time, and materials. Peabody must decide <br />if there is a way to avoid these costs and the impacts on the reclamation. Given the amount of energy in the <br />flow down these very steep drainages during extreme runoff events, construction of larger structures and /or <br />removal of rocks below the TRM may be the only solution. <br />The following photographs were taken by Rob Zuber during this inspection. <br />Office of Office of <br />Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and inactive Mines <br />Mined Land Reclamation <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />COLORADO <br />D I V I S I O N O F <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />— &— <br />SAFETY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.