Laserfiche WebLink
Colowyo, C3981 -019, PR3 adequacy No. 3 28 July 22, 2011 <br />b) Why is the ditch in area A26 labeled D15? Is this a mistake? <br />The response is inadequate. The map has not been revised. <br />c) It appears that a small area that drains to Structure 19 is missing on the figure. The <br />Subwatershed Hydrology Detail table lists two small tributary areas but only one is <br />shown on the figure. <br />The response is adequate. <br />d) For mountain brush areas, the legend in Figure A -1 should indicate a CN of 41, not <br />57. <br />t he response is adegaaie. <br />e) Forjuniper areas, the legend in Figure A -1 should indicate a CN of 73, not 63. <br />I hC I .auncnt shut ('( C ce. I ith DR\IS. CA' <br />r aluc, far lumps nu tic ro.ip and in the model k'sc eorreetlr eha "I-11 t„ <br />t) For bare areas, the legend in Figure A -1 should indicate a CN of 91, not 85. <br />the re,pon.e i. :idey lane. <br />g) The area that drains to ditch D7 /D8 (Area A -30) needs to extend to north. <br />Tic response is adequate. <br />11. In the design details in Table 7- 23C -1, some of the details for the perforated riser for the Little <br />Cullom Pond (namely the barrel diameter, barrel length, and barrel slope) do not match these <br />details in the Structure Detail for Structure #1 in the SEDCAD report. <br />The response is adequate. <br />13. Within Exhibit 7, Item 26, on the Little Collom Pond Design Drawing, Figure 1, please address <br />the following errors: <br />I. The Area - Capacity table does not match the Elevation- Capacity- Discharge table in <br />Exhibit 7, Item 23. Please confirm which table is correct and that the contours on <br />the figure are correct and match the correct table. <br />The response is inadeluate. The Area - Capacity table still does not match the <br />Elevation- Capacity- Discharne table in Exhibit 7 Item'' -?. <br />2. One of the construction notes has text that has been truncated. <br />