Laserfiche WebLink
B. New species: No new species have been noted. In a few places this year, the thistles <br />appear to be stronger. This is especially true of the large, magenta flowered species <br />such as Bull and Musk thistle and to a lesser extent Scotch thistle. Last year Canada <br />thistle was moved to the top of the list for control efforts over the next year or two. <br />Control efforts on this and other thistles has made a difference, but more is needed. <br />The thistles are still a problem, even though the scope of the problem has been <br />significantly reduced. <br />2. Weed status on lessee responsibility lands: As described above. <br />OTHER INFORMATION THAT MIGHT BE USEFUL FOR FUTURE REFERENCE: <br />Nothing of special note. <br />DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL CONDITIONS OR EVENTS: Over the last year increasing <br />interest in oil and gas, particularly gas, development on this part of the Lowry Range is of some <br />concern to the mining and the mine reclamation program. At this point in time, it does not appear <br />conflicts between the two will be common and what difficulties that might arise should be easy to <br />remedy. However, it is of concern that land will be disturbed within Schmidt's Reclamation Permit <br />boundary that they will not be responsible for. This creates a legal challenge because the reclamation <br />law does not actually provide directly for these kinds of activities occurring in the same area. <br />Currently, thought is being given to finding a way to document these oil and gas development <br />disturbances and making sure that there are no legal problems that arise due to a conflict. It might be <br />useful for the oil and gas development people to use the seed mixture that Schmidt uses when they <br />reclaim land, but that is not really the difficulty. The real difficulty is the overlap in the Reclamation <br />Permit and avoiding Schmidt from becoming responsible for someone else's activities that are <br />completely legal and consistent with the use of the land. This is viewed as a temporary problem that <br />should be easy to solve by simply documenting disturbances and making decisions as to what remains <br />in the permit and what is released from bond because of the other uses. <br />PHOTOGRAPHS: Following are five photographs. These are of the reclamation at each of the five <br />reclamation areas discussed in this report. Although it would require many photographs to fully <br />represent the species and the diversity of vegetation variations in each area, especially the two large <br />ones, these images provide an overall representative view of each area. Each photograph was taken on <br />July 8, 2011. Marker lines and labels show the boundaries of the reclamation areas. By comparing the <br />more distant portions of the reclamation areas to adjacent undisturbed land at least some idea can be <br />gained of how closely the color and texture of the natural vs the reclamation vegetation match or <br />blend. It can also be seen how well the form and line of the reclamation grading work did to blend the <br />location into the natural topography. Form, line, color, and texture are the four elements of landscape <br />visual analysis. In a general sense at least, the reclamation has produced a pleasant blending of these <br />characteristics with very little negative deviation. <br />Status report for 2009 <br />dormant for a long time and then suddenly spring up when nobody is suspecting them <br />or looking. <br />due July 15, 2010 Page 12 of 13 <br />