My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-07-12_REVISION - M1990057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1990057
>
2011-07-12_REVISION - M1990057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:12:51 PM
Creation date
7/21/2011 9:18:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1990057
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
7/12/2011
Doc Name
Slope stability evaluation (TR-03)
From
The Union Milling Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR3
Email Name
DMC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS <br />The subsoils found in the borings generally consisted of sandy clay <br />overlying clayey sand and gravel to the total depth drilled of 30 feet. Three feet of <br />embankment fill was encountered in TH -2. TH -1 was drilled adjacent to the <br />embankment where we encountered 7 feet of sandy clay. The test pits from our <br />previous work also encountered sandy clay at the ground surface underlain by <br />clayey gravel and sand. Refusal due to rocks occurred in TH -1 at 17 feet. We <br />encountered groundwater in TH -2 at 25 feet. <br />The clay was very stiff and very sandy. Three samples obtained during <br />drilling contained 52 to 58 percent silt and clay -size particles (passing the No. 200 <br />sieve). Four samples contained from 3 to 33 percent gravel in our gradation analysis <br />and from 23 to 58 percent silt and clay -size particles (passing the No. 200 sieve). <br />The particle size in these samples was limited by the sampling barrel (1.935 inch <br />I.D.). The gravel was medium dense and very clayey and sandy with thin layers of <br />sand and /or clay. Based upon the material observed in the stockpile, there are also <br />cobbles within the gravel deposits. We were not able to sample the cobbles in our <br />borings due to the size of the sampling barrel. Sampling of the stockpile involved <br />random grab samples as shown in Picture 4. Sampling included gravel and cobbles <br />from the stockpile. The samples may not be fully representative of the larger sized <br />material (cobbles) in the stockpile or natural ground. <br />REGULATIONS <br />The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board administers the rules and <br />regulations that govern tailings pond embankments. Rule 6.5 of the "Hard Rock, <br />Metal, and Designated Mining Operations" dated September 30, 2010 provides the <br />geotechnical requirements an Applicant must meet for a permit. There are several <br />provisions in this rule that this letter addresses. <br />• an Applicant shall be required to provide a geotechnical evaluation of all <br />geologic hazards that have the potential to affect any proposed <br />impoundment, slope, embankment, highwall or waste pile in the affected <br />area. <br />o We have not identified any geologic hazard that would preclude <br />the development of the tailings pond as designed for the Union <br />Mill. <br />• an Applicant shall be required to provide engineering stability analysis for <br />proposed final reclaimed slopes, highwalls, waste piles, embankments, and <br />ore leach facilities. <br />o We have performed stability analysis for the proposed <br />embankment and planned tailings configuration. We find that a <br />factor of safety of 2.3 or greater applies to the proposed design. <br />THE UNION MILLING COMPANY <br />TAILINGS POND EMBANKMENT AND FUTURE TAILINGS SLOPE <br />UNION MILL <br />CTL T PROJECT NO. DN45,584 -130 <br />S:\PROJECTS 45500 \DN45584.000 \130\3. Lettere\L1 \DN45584- 130- L1.doc <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.