My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-07-07_PERMIT FILE - M2011036 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2011036
>
2011-07-07_PERMIT FILE - M2011036 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:35:25 PM
Creation date
7/13/2011 10:48:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2011036
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
7/7/2011
Doc Name
New 112c permit application
From
Moffat County
To
DRMS
Email Name
DMC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Today's Date: Time of blast: <br />Record Keeping <br />keeping must never be tolerated. In the event of litigation, the <br />absence of such documentation places a defendant in an extremely <br />precarious position. <br />One point that sometimes causes a certain amount of confusion, <br />and that can lead to argument, is the "shot to structure or <br />instrument" distance. The regulations require recording the <br />direction and distance from the nearest blast hole to the nearest <br />structure. From the point of view of vibration data collection and <br />vibration prediction, where the scaled distance is the basic <br />criterion, it is important to measure the distance from the center <br />of the group or row of holes that represent the maximum charge <br />weight per 8 ms delay. It may be that two or more groups of holes <br />having similar charge weights per delay may have to be considered. <br />In that event, the distance recorded would be that distance - and <br />charge weight per delay - that resulted in the lowest scaled <br />distance. In most cases, only academic differences will be <br />observed; but in case significant differences do appear, both <br />distances should be recorded and identified: <br />REPORT OF BLASTING OPERATION <br />(Military) <br />(Time ) Location of blast: <br />Supervisor, in- charge of blast: Name: Signature: Lic.P <br />(bo not /ncludiT <br />Commercial or (Company Owned or) <br />Distance form nearest hole to: (Circle one) Dwelling, School, Church,lnetitutional bldg.: ft.(Leneed Property) <br />Direction to property: !ISSN Weather Conditions at time of blast:( ) Cloudy ^_, Clear , Partial Overcase <br />Temp. , Barometric Reeding , Wind Description Remarks <br />Material blasted:( ) Overburden, Parting , Other Explain <br />Total number of holes shot: Burden ft. Spacing ft. <br />Depth of holes: From: ft TO ft. Diameter of holes: inches. <br />Type of explosives used:( ) AN- FO- Bagged_, Bulk , Other Explain <br />Total weight of <br />Explosives used: ff Decking: Yes No <br />Max. pounds detonated within any 8 ms period: P Max. number of holes detonated with any 8ma period: <br />Method of detonation:( ) Nonel , Electric cap , Other , Explain <br />Type of circuit used:( ) Series , Parallel , Nonel , Other Explain <br />Stemming information: Type used: ,Depth: ft., Was protective cover used? Yes No <br />Type of delay detonator used: . Minimum delay periods millisecond. <br />Distance from nearest hole to seisteccor: ft. Exact location of seisteccor: <br />Name of mine personnel servicing seisteccor: (print) <br />Name of firm analyzing seistector print -outs: <br />O V <br />u m Name of person analyzing print -outs: <br />p°p a e i Seistector reading of this blast: <br />g.%4 <br />Figure 50. <br />Typical blast record form. <br />103 <br />County: <br />State: <br />Permit: <br />'lwp : <br />Mine 1DA <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.