2011-07-11_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088

Home Browse Search

Mike Boulay -6- July 8, 2011 CAM - Enclosed are monitoring well permits for RW -1, RW -2. They should be inserted into Volume I, Exhibit 13. CAM has not received the monitoring well permits for RW -3 and RW -4 located on property owned by Tavistock. 8. Division Response: Response accepted. 9. Division Response: Response accepted. 10. Ground surface elevation information for the monitoring wells does not appear to be consistent between the summary table information on the typical diagram in Exhibit 3 as compared with the As -Built Drawings for the well completions provided in Exhibit 14. Have the wells been re- surveyed by CAM? If so, were the ground surface and top of casing elevations surveyed? Please expand the well completion summary table on the typical diagram to include the following: ground surface elevation, top of casing or measuring point elevation, and perforated interval depth. CAM Response: CAM generated their topography, based on aerial photography from May of 2010 and believes it to be accurate. The completion diagrams provided in Exhibit 14 do not match up with the typical diagram data shown in Exhibit 3, as RW -1 and RW -2 are not the same wells. CAM chose well locations based on location and numbered them according to their own nomenclature, not based on Gary Refining nomenclature. • As for RW -1, there are two wells in the current location, and therefore, the completion diagram included in the 1981 data could be the well that CAM is not using and therefore not applicable. • RW -2 used by CAM is not the RW -2 shown in the completion diagram in Exhibit 14. • The RW -3 ground surface elevation shown in Exhibit 3 is accurate based on the generated topography. The pipe stick up listed in Exhibit 3 was recently measured, and therefore believed to be more accurate than what is shown on the completion diagram in Exhibit 14. • The RW -4 ground surface elevation shown in Exhibit 3 is accurate based CAM's generated topography. The pipe stick up listed in Exhibit 3 was recently measured, and therefore believed to be more accurate than what is shown on the completion diagram in Exhibit 14. The ground surface elevation as well as the pipe stick up is currently shown on the typical construction diagram in Exhibit 3. The pipe stick up, as shown on the completion diagram in Exhibit 3, is measured from the ground to the top of the pipe (or concrete, if applicable, to the top of pipe). The perforated zone is unknown for each monitoring well. The completion diagram in Exhibit 3 has been revised to include the top of pipe stick up elevation in the summary table.