My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-07-11_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2011-07-11_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:35:29 PM
Creation date
7/11/2011 10:38:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE
Doc Date
7/11/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Response #1
From
J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc
To
DRMS
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mike Boulay <br />-20- July 8, 2011 <br />protective berm on the outside of ditch D2 -b in this area and revising Map 16 <br />accordingly. <br />CAM - The section near D2 -b is in cut, so a berm is not required. For clarity, contours <br />have been more clearly annotated on Map -16. For additional clarity, please see <br />Map -21 section A -A'. <br />51. The plan and profile of the proposed rail loop is provided on Map 21; there is very <br />little other information presented within the application. Based on communication <br />with Ms. Stover - Bishop, Union Pacific railroad has its own detailed requirements <br />governing the construction of embankments. Please provide a summary of those <br />requirements for inclusion within the permit text. Otherwise, the Division will need <br />to require that the embankments be constructed in accordance with the Rules for <br />roads and embankments. <br />CAM Response: Page 2.05.9 has been revised, and Union Pacific Construction <br />Standards have been provided in new Exhibit 16. <br />Division Response: Page 2.05 -9 was revised, and Union Pacific rail line <br />specifications were incorporated into the application as Exhibit 16. The UP <br />specifications are, however, incomplete. Only odd - numbered pages have been <br />provided. Please incorporate the missing pages into Exhibit 16. <br />Rule 2.05.3(3)(c)(i) requires that specifications for each bridge be provided. On <br />page 2.05 -9, the bridge is described as being 9' in width and 60' in length, <br />constructed of steel girders with concrete abutments. The second paragraph <br />states that geotechnical work on the foundation will be performed prior to <br />construction of the bridge. Please provide general details and a plan sheet of the <br />proposed bridge for inclusion in the permit application <br />CAM Response: Please see the Bridge plan and profile shown on Map -21. <br />Division Response: Map -21 was revised to incorporate the proposed Bridge Plan <br />and Profile as a separate detail in the lower right -hand corner. The Division <br />understands that final design of the bridge will be completed in the near future. <br />Upon completion of the final design, please modify the plan /profile view on <br />Map 21 to include additional details such as the abutments, or provide a <br />separate plan /profile sheet for this purpose. <br />In the view provided on Map 21, Bridge is misspelled "Bride ". Please correct the <br />spelling. <br />CAM - Please see revised Exhibit 16. Spelling of "Bridge" has been corrected on <br />Map -21. Revised design for the bridge has been included on Map -21. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.