My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-07-06_REVISION - C1980001
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980001
>
2011-07-06_REVISION - C1980001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:35:23 PM
Creation date
7/6/2011 1:48:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
7/6/2011
Doc Name
Hydrology Review (Memo)
From
Rub Zuber
To
Janet Binns
Type & Sequence
RN6
Email Name
JHB
RDZ
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866 -3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832 -8106 <br />Inter - office Memorandum <br />To: Janet Binns <br />From: Rob Zuber <br />Subject: Hydrology review of RN -06 for Edna Mine (Permit # C -1980 -001) <br />Date: July 6, 2011 <br />Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />The renewal application (RN -06) for Edna Mine, prepared for Chevron Mining Inc. by WWC <br />Engineering, was received by the Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (Division) on May 12, <br />2011. I have found that, in regards to protection of the hydrologic balance, the operations of the Edna <br />Mine: <br />• Meet the terms of the permit application package (Permit # C- 1980 -001), <br />• Comply with the Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act, and <br />• Comply with the Regulations of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for Coal Mining. <br />I have no concerns that Edna Mine is contributing significant loads of sediment or other pollutants off <br />site. Per my review of the 2010 AHR, previous AHR reviews, and DMR reports, there have been some <br />exceedances of effluent limits For example, values for Manganese were above the effluent limits (30 -day <br />average) in January 2010. However, no exceedances indicate a chronic water quality or hydrologic <br />balance problem, and, as appropriate, the Water Quality Control Division (WQCD) has been notified of <br />these exceedances. Per a Memorandum of Understanding between WQCD and DRMS, WQCD is the <br />lead agency regarding enforcement of effluent limit violations. <br />One small item from the PAP (Janet, you can decide if this warrants mention in the RN -06 adequacy <br />letter): in Section 2.5.3.4 Alluvial Valley Floor Effects, on page 2.5 -98 it was noted by a previous EPS <br />that the discussion on salt tolerance should include more discussion on specific plants, rather than just a <br />general comment that salt tolerant vegetation prevails in the area. <br />COLORADO <br />D I V I S I O N O F <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />—&— <br />SAFETY <br />Office of <br />Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.