Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 of 4 <br />102. Item Resolved. <br />103. Item Resolved. <br />104. Item Resolved. <br />105. Item Resolved. <br />106. Item Resolved. <br />107. Item Resolved. <br />108. The narrative in the permit application in Section 2.06.8 states that two out of three topsoil <br />samples are very strongly saline. To strengthen this point, please amend the text to include the <br />additional topsoil sample TLO -4 which was taken in the borrow area to the south of the main <br />permit area. Also, please include a reference in the text to Tab 7, Soil Resource Information <br />(Baseline Survey) to clarify and support the statement of poor soil conditions. <br />109. Item Resolved. <br />110. Item Resolved <br />111. ERO's report (page 3) states they used aerial photos of Mesa County from 1937 to confirm <br />MRCS's conclusion that the area was not cultivated prior to the refinery. Please include a copy <br />of these photographs in the report as evidence to further describe the land use prior to the <br />establishment of the refinery. <br />112. Item Resolved. <br />