My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-21_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2011-06-21_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:34:43 PM
Creation date
6/22/2011 9:31:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
6/21/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Review No. 2
From
DRMS
To
CAM Colordo, LLC
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Corey Heaps <br />CAM Colorado LLC <br />June 21, 2011 Page 44 <br />impacts must be determined on the basis of local and regional conditions after consultation <br />with and approval by the Colorado Division of Wildlife (DOW). CAM must provide a <br />basis for not reestablishing woody plants; and documentation that DOW has been consulted <br />and that DOW approves of no shrub standard must be provided. <br />CAM Response: Please see revised page 2.05.36. Revegetation success criteria for the <br />woody plant density for rangeland and fish/wildlife areas will be based upon the <br />greasewood reference area. <br />Division Response: The language used to describe the woody plant density standard is <br />confusing and it is not clear if a reference area or technical standard will be used for <br />comparison to show success. The Division suggests that CAM use only the approved <br />greasewood reference area as a standard which achieves 90% woody plant density of <br />the approved greasewood reference area sample mean at the 90% confidence level. <br />75. For the diversity success standard, the Division believes it would be appropriate to also <br />include a half -shrub and a perennial grass component. <br />CAM Response: Please see revised seed mixes SM -1 and SM -2 in Exhibit 4. <br />Division Response: In the baseline vegetation survey, inland saltgrass (Distichlis spicata) <br />was the only species of grass that contributed to plant cover. The Division suggests adding <br />inland saltgrass (Distichlis spicata) to the reclamation seed mix. For the diversity success <br />standard, the Division believes that it is appropriate to include a native perennial grass. <br />Please add to the diversity standard on page 2.05 -38 that one perennial grass will <br />contribute at least 3% relative cover. <br />76. CAM is not proposing to sample for woody stem density in the revegetation. This is based <br />on the as yet to be approved proposal to not include a woody plant density standard. Since <br />shrubs are a major component of the baseline vegetation community, it is likely that shrubs <br />will also be a major component in the reclamation and therefore, the shrub density should <br />be collected. Please include data collection for woody stem density in the reclamation. <br />CAM Response: Please see revised page 2.05 -36. <br />Division response: Response accepted. <br />Rule 2.05.4(2)(f) Disposal of Debris, Acid Forming and Toxic Forming-Materials <br />77. Narrative in this section states that there is no indication that any -acid forming or toxic <br />forming materials will be encountered on site. While data in Tab 6 appear to confirm the <br />absence of acid forming materials, the absence of toxic forming materials is not supported, <br />and the narrative will need to be revised. "Toxic Forming Materials" is defined in Rule <br />1.04 (139) as "...earth materials or wastes which, if acted upon by air, water, weathering, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.